![]() |
![]() |
Free Books / Finance / The English Manual Of Banking / | ![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
An Act for Amending The Law Relating To Crossed Cheques |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
This section is from the book "The English Manual Of Banking", by Arthur Crump. Also available from Amazon: The English manual of banking.
[15th August, 1876.]
Be it enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
1. This Act may be cited as The Crossed Cheques Act, 1876.
2. The Acts described in the schedule to this Act are hereby repealed, but this repeal shall not affect any right, interest, or liability acquired or accrued before the passing of this Act.
3. In this Act -
"Cheque" means a draft or order on a banker payable to bearer or to order on demand, and includes a warrant for payment of dividend on stock sent by post by the Governor and Company of the Bank of England or of Ireland, under the authority of any Act of Parliament for the time being in force:
"Banker" includes persons or a corporation or company acting as bankers.
4. Where a cheque bears across its face an addition of the words "and company," or any abbreviation thereof, between two parallel transverse lines, or of two parallel transverse lines simply, and either with or without the words "not negotiable" that addition shall be deemed a crossing, and the cheque shall be deemed to be crossed generally.
Where a cheque bears across its face an addition of the name of a banker, either with or without the words " not negotiable," that addition shall be deemed a crossing, and the cheque shall be deemed to be crossed specially, and to be crossed to that banker.
5. Where a cheque is uncrossed, a lawful holder may cross it generally or specially.
Where a cheque is crossed generally, a lawful holder may cross it specially.
Where a cheque is crossed generally or specially, a lawful holder may add the words not negotiable.
Where a cheque is crossed specially, the banker to whom it is crossed may again cross it specially to another banker, his agent for collection.
6. A crossing authorised by this Act shall be deemed a material part of the cheque, and it shall not be lawful for any person to obliterate or, except as authorised by this Act, to add to or alter the crossing.
7. Where a cheque is crossed generally, the banker on whom it is drawn shall not pay it otherwise than to a banker.
Where a cheque is crossed specially, the banker on whom it is drawn shall not pay it otherwise than to the banker to whom it is crossed, or to his agent for collection.
8. Where a cheque is crossed specially to more than one banker, except when crossed to an agent for the purpose of collection, the banker on whom'it is drawn shall refuse payment thereof.
9. Where the banker on whom a crossed cheque is drawn has in good faith and without negligence paid such cheque, if crossed generally to a banker, and if crossed specially to the banker to whom it is crossed, or his agent for collection being a banker, the banker paying the cheque and (in case such cheque has come to the hands of the payee) the drawer thereof shall respectively be entitled to the same rights, and be placed in the same position in all respects, as they would respectively have been entitled to and have been placed in if the amount of the cheque had been paid to and received by the true owner thereof.
10. Any banker paying a cheque crossed generally otherwise than to a banker, or a cheque crossed specially otherwise than to the banker to whom the same shall be crossed, or his agent for collection, being a banker, shall be liable to the true owner of the cheque for any loss he may sustain owing to the cheque having been so paid.
11. Where a cheque is presented for payment, which does not at the time of presentation appear to be crossed, or to have had a crossing which has been obliterated, or to have been added to or altered otherwise than as authorised by this Act, a banker paying the cheque, in good faith and without negligence, shall not be responsible or incur any liability, nor shall the payment be questioned, by reason of the cheque having been crossed, or of the crossing having been obliterated, or having been added to or altered otherwise than as authorised by this Act, and of payment being made otherwise than to a banker or the banker to whom the cheque is or was crossed, or to his agent for collection being a banker (as the case may be).
12. A person taking a cheque crossed generally or specially, bearing in either case the words " not negotiable," shall not have and shall not be capable of giving a better title to the cheque than that which the person from whom he took it had.
But a banker who has in good faith and without negligence received payment for a customer of a cheque crossed generally or specially to himself shall not, in case the title to the cheque proves defective, incur any liability to the true owner of the cheque by reason only of having received such payment.
Schedule. Acts repealed.
19 & 20 Vict. c. 25. An Act to amend the law relating to drafts on bankers.
21 & 22 Vict. c. 79. An Act to amend the law relating to cheques or drafts on bankers.
We have here several alterations, some technical, others in matters of principle.
For the first time the " two parallel transverse lines simply " constitute a legal crossing. This may be considered an improvement, as many people believed that the two lines were sufficient and acted accordingly, thereby embarrassing their bankers.
The permission given by the fourth clause to add to a general or special crossing the words " not negotiable, the effect of which, as explained by the twelfth clause, is that a person taking such a cheque shall not have and shall not be capable of giving a better title to the cheque than that which the person from whom he took it had " was inserted as a supposed bar to the negotiation of a stolen cheque, but will probably become a dead letter. If such a clause was necessary it would have been much more simple to make it apply to all cheques crossed or uncrossed. It would only have made people a little more careful as to the exchange of cheques for strangers.
 
Continue to:
banking, cheques, finance, currency, exchange, private banks, stocks, credit, bills
![]() |
|
|