![]() |
![]() |
Free Books / Real Estate / American Law Of Real Estate Agency / | ![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Sec. 1016. Instruction Authorizing Recovery Upon Either Of Two Hypotheses, Not In Conflict |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
This section is from the book "American Law Of Real Estate Agency", by William Slee Walker. Also available from Amazon: American law of real estate agency.
In an action for a broker's commissions against stockholders of a brewing company for a sale of its property, where the evidence showed that the debts of the company were about $30,000, that the purchasers assumed this indebtedness, relieving defendants from any liability thereon, and that by the written contract of sale the purchasers relieved defendants of all personal liability on the obligations of the company, not to exceed $30,000, there was no conflict between instructions authorizing a recovery of ten per cent. of the debts of the company from which the defendants were to be relieved as sureties, and one authorizing a recovery of ten per cent. of the debts of every kind of the company. Morgan v. Keller, 194 Mo. 663, 92 S. W. 75.
 
Continue to:
agent, real estate agency, brokerage, commissions, compensation, contracts, duties, exchanges, exclusive contracts, forms, interpretations, judicial constructions, leases, liabilities of principal, listing, loans, options, contracts, pleadings, practice, law, rights, sales
![]() |
|
|