![]() |
![]() |
Free Books / Real Estate / American Law Of Real Estate Agency / | ![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Sec. 1040. Instruction Caused No Prejudice To Defendant When Jury Found No Excess Money Was Paid |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
This section is from the book "American Law Of Real Estate Agency", by William Slee Walker. Also available from Amazon: American law of real estate agency.
In an action for commissions agreed to be paid per acre in a sale of property, instructions relating to plaintiff's claim to the excess of purchase money above a named sum cannot have prejudiced defendant when the jury expressly found that no purchase money was received in excess of that sum. Wilson v. Everitt, 139 U. S. 616, 11 Sup. Ct. 664; Gaume v. Horgan, 122 Mo. App. 700, 99 S. W. 457.
 
Continue to:
agent, real estate agency, brokerage, commissions, compensation, contracts, duties, exchanges, exclusive contracts, forms, interpretations, judicial constructions, leases, liabilities of principal, listing, loans, options, contracts, pleadings, practice, law, rights, sales
![]() |
|
|