(64) In an action to recover an agreed commission for procuring a loan for defendant, brought on the theory that plaintiff found a person willing to make the loan, but refused to do so, on his discovery that there was not the amount of timber represented by defendants on the land to be given as security, evidence held to sustain findings that the representations by defendants as to the amount of timber on the laud were not intended as other than an expression of opinion as to the quantity of timber, and that the plaintiff did not rely thereon. McDonald v. Dietderich, 118 P. 341, 65 Wash. 487.

(65) Evidence, in an action for a commission due to plaintiff's assignor for procuring an exchange of property; held, to show that the exchange was effected by assignor's efforts, and that both property owners utilized his efforts in the negotiations. In-man v. Brown, 147 S. W. 652, - Tex. Civ. App. - .

(66) Evidence held to support a finding that the broker employed to procure a purchaser of real estate was the efficient cause of the sale actually made by another broker, authorizing a recovery of commission. Bellis v. Hann & Kendall, 157 S. W. 427, - Tex. Civ. App. - .

(67) In an action by a broker for commission, evidence examined, and held to warrant a finding that plaintiff produced a purchaser ready, willing and able to buy, but that the property sold was taken in the name of another to defeat payment of commissions. Fist v. Currie, 112 P. 689, 49 Colo. 284.

(68) Evidence, in an action for commission in procuring a purchaser for a farm; held, insufficient to justify the jury in finding the proposed purchaser could raise sufficient money. White v. Ames, 179 I11. App. 220.

(69) Evidence, in an action by a broker for commission; held, sufficient to sustain finding that defendant, with full knowledge of the contents of the written contract of sale made by the broker, ratified it. Wilson v. Burch, 162 S. W. 1018, - Tex. Civ. App. - .

(70) Evidence, in an action for procuring a purchaser for realty; held, to show that plaintiff's sub-agent was guilty of bad faith toward the owner, so as to defeat a recovery of commissions by plaintiff for making the sale. Alford v. Creagh, 62 S. 254, 7 Ala. App. 358.

(71) Evidence held to warrant a finding that defendant was not induced by fraudulent representations to sign a contract employing plaintiff to sell certain real estate for him, or a deed by which the property was conveyed to a customer which complainant procured. Ingram v. Coleman, 160 S. W. 886, 110 Ark. 632.

(72) In an action by a broker who effected a sale of a placer mine, evidence held sufficient to support a finding that he acted as a mere middleman, and that he was not guilty of any bad faith in accepting compensation from the purchasers, and hence might recover from the seller the agreed commission. King v. Reed, 141 P. 41, 24 Cal. App. 229.

(73) Evidence, in an action for commission for exchange of real estate, examined and held not to show misrepresentation by plaintiff as to the dimensions of property for which exchange was made. Madden v. Davis, 192 I11. App. 575.

(74) Evidence examined, and held to show that defendant had notice that plaintiff was representing both parties. Id.

(75) Evidence held to sustain a finding that the broker employed to procure a purchaser fraudulently procured a conveyance to himself, and then conveyed the property at a higher price to a customer. Brocken v. Jackson, 140 N. W. 892, 159 Iowa, 424.

(76) In an action for a commission in negotiating an exchange, defended on the ground of double employment, evidence held sufficient to warrant a finding that defendant knew before the exchange was agreed upon that the other party had agreed to pay plaintiffs a commission. Redmond Bros. v. Henke, 114 N. W. 885, 137 Iowa, 228.

(77) In an action by a real estate broker to recover commission, evidence held to sustain a finding that his acts were free from fraud. Jones v. Arnold, 132 P. 1000, 89 Kan. 755.

(78) In an action for commission for procuring a purchaser of real estate, evidence held to support a finding that plaintiff procured a purchaser while acting for himself, and not for a third person. Crawford-Chesterfield Co. v. Snook, 142 S. W. 385, 146 Ky. 248.

(79) Evidence, in an action for broker's commission, held to show that he merely brought the parties together, and did not act for either in the negotiations. American Security Co. v. Penney, 152 N. W. 771, 129 Minn. 369.

(80) Evidence held to warrant a finding that the broker employed to sell certain property, and on whose representation a valid sale was made, became jointly interested with the purchaser in the purchase during the transaction, without knowledge of such interest on the part of his employers. Waterbury v. Barry, 130 N. Y. Sup. 517, 145 App. Div. 773.

(81) In an action by a broker for commission for procuring one ready, able and willing to contract for an exchange of real estate, evidence held to support a finding that the contract of exchange was procured without any misrepresentation of fact. Bucksdorf v. Bender, 141 F. Y. Sup. 515, 80 Misc. Rep. 498.

(82) Evidence held not to show the good faith necessary to entitle plaintiff, who was employed by the lessee to procure a lease, to recover a commission from the lessor. Gulick v. Investor Estates Corp., 151 N. Y. Supp. 513.

(83) In an action for broker's commission for sale of land, evidence held to show that plaintiff did not act as the purchaser's agent before or when the sale was made. Toland v. Williams & Wiley, 129 S. W. 392, - Tex. Civ. App. - .

(84) Evidence held to show that the broker employed for the owner, to procure a purchaser, did not receive compensation from the purchaser obtained. Moore v. J. N. Johnson Land Co., 143 S. W. 941, - Tex. Civ. App. - .

(85) In a suit to recover real estate commissions, evidence held to warrant a finding that defendant contracted to pay the commission claimed. Michael v. White, 181 S. W. 130, 121 Ark. 315.