There being a conflict of evidence the question is exclusively for the jury, and a finding will not be disturbed on appeal. Mousseau v. Dorsett, 80 Ga. 566, 5 S. E. 780; Semple v. Rand, 112 Iowa 616, 84 N. W. 683; Hall v. Grace, 179 Mass. 400, 60 N. E. 932; Holschien v. Fehleg, 55 Mo. App. 375; Sherwin v. O'Connor, 24 Neb. 603, 39 N. W. 620; Abraham v. Burstein, 178 N. Y. 586, 70 N. E. 1094; Smith v. Cutter, 66 N. Y. S. 332, 54 App. Div. 618; Van Sicler v. Herbst, 51 N. Y. S. 968, 30 App. Div. 255; Chase v. Veal, 83 Tex. 333, 18 S. W. 597; Faulkner v Crawford, 177 S. W. 35, 119 Ark. 6; Sill v. Ceschi, 140 P. 949, 167 Cal. 698; Naylor v. Ashton, 130 P. 181, 20 Cal. App. 544; Monroe v. Orr, 171 I11. App. 655; Nat. Milling Co. v. Kirby, 94 A. 149, - E. I. -; Evans v. Russell, 147 N. W. 489, 180 Mich. 534; Konda v. Fay, 136 P. 514, 22 Cal. App. 722; Brooks v. Lewis, 77 S. E. 101, 12 Ga. App. 260; Shead v. Louisiana Lumber Co., 182 I11. App. 310; Parker v. Land & Imp. Co., 165 P. 1086, - Wash. Sup. -; Williamson v. Martin Ozburn Realty Co., 91 S. E. 510, 19 Ga. App. 425; Chaleff v. Mendelsohn, 164 N. Y. Sup. 680; Shannon v. Cobbell, 67 Pa. Super. Ct. 538; Anderson v. Reiter, 198 I11. App. 581; Nix v. Tomlinson, 200 S. W. 897, - Tex. Civ. App. -; Wayler v. Norris, 205 I11. App. 69; Sickafus v. Vickrey, 206 I11. App. 584; Fergason v. Quick, 79 S. 83, rev. judg. on sug. of re., 78 S. 618, - Miss. Sup. -; Red River Valley Land Co. v. Hutchison, 170 N. W. 317, - N. D. Sup. -; Davis v. Joiner Realty Co., 99 S. E. 60, - Ga, App. -;

Baker v. Greer, 208 S. W. 755; Mooney v. Burgess, 172 N W. 308, - Minn. Sup. -; Hensley v. Watkins, 101 S. B. 758, - Ga. App. -; Murphy v. W. & W. Live Stock Co., 187 P. 187, re. den., 189 P. 857, - Wyo. Sup. -; Frank Hart Realty Co. v. Ryan, 218 S. W. 412, - Mo. App. -; Pixley v. Gonder, 189 P. 149, - Kan. Sup. -; Kirby Lumber Co. v. West, 220 S. W. 639, - Tex. Civ. App. -; Ramezzano v. Avansino, 189 P. 681, - Nev. Sup. - .