![]() |
![]() |
Free Books / Real Estate / American Law Of Real Estate Agency / | ![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Sec. 1059. Verdict Not Directed For Plaintiff, Where Customer Was Not Of Restricted Class |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
This section is from the book "American Law Of Real Estate Agency", by William Slee Walker. Also available from Amazon: American law of real estate agency.
Where the evidence of plaintiff, suing to recover commissions for procuring a purchaser for defendant's land, of itself makes out a case, the court will not direct a verdict in his favor, if the evidence of the defendant shows that under the contract plaintiff was restricted to negotiate a sale with certain persons, and the one procured by him did not belong to that class. Meyer v. Strauss, 58 N. Y. S. 904, 42 App. Div. 613.
 
Continue to:
agent, real estate agency, brokerage, commissions, compensation, contracts, duties, exchanges, exclusive contracts, forms, interpretations, judicial constructions, leases, liabilities of principal, listing, loans, options, contracts, pleadings, practice, law, rights, sales
![]() |
|
|