On the trial of an action for a broker's commissions on an exchange of property in which the defense was that the defendant had been induced to part with his property by plaintiff's false representations; after plaintiff had been permitted to testify that defendant had told him that his property would not sell for the amount of the mortgage on it, and also that in plaintiff's opinion, defendant's property was worth less than that exchanged for it, defendant attempted to prove the value of his property, but the evidence was excluded; the court afterward, on plaintiff's request, charged that if defendant did not rely on any false representations made, plaintiff must recover. Held, that the exclusion of the evidence of the value of defendant's property was error. Walker v. Johnson, 46 N. Y. S. 864, 21 Misc. 16. See also Sec. 194.