 |
 |
Free Books / Real Estate / American Law Of Real Estate Agency / |  |
|
|
||||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
   |
|
||
|
Sec. 1077. It Is Not Error To Prove By Plaintiff That No Sale Was Made |
|
||
|
||||
|
|
|
||
|
||||
This section is from the book "American Law Of Real Estate Agency", by William Slee Walker. Also available from Amazon: American law of real estate agency.
In an action by a broker to procure a purchaser of real estate for his commissions, it is not error to allow defendant to prove by plaintiff's testimony that no sale of the premises had in fact been made. Runck v. Dimmick, 111 S. W. 779 (Tex. Civ. App. '08.)
Continue to:
agent, real estate agency, brokerage, commissions, compensation, contracts, duties, exchanges, exclusive contracts, forms, interpretations, judicial constructions, leases, liabilities of principal, listing, loans, options, contracts, pleadings, practice, law, rights, sales
|
|
|
|
 |
|