An agent to sell land on credit has no implied authority to receive payment therefor, nor to receive payment before due, nor in anything but money. Mann v. Robinson, 19 W. Va. 49. Compare Sec. 335. A broker employed to sell real estate has no authority to bind his principal by a contract to sell on credit unless expressly authorized. Staten v. Hammer, 121 Iowa, 499, 96 N. W. 964; Smith v. McCann, 205 Pa. St. 57, 54 A. 498; Edwards v. Davidson (Tex. Civ. App. '04), 79 S. W. 48; Rundte v. Cutting, 18 Colo. 337, 32 P. 994; Gilbert v. Baxter, 71 Iowa, 327, 32 N. W. 364; Wanless v. McCanless, 38 Iowa, 20; Kemp-ner v. Gans, 111 S. W. 1123, 87 Ark. 221, re. den. 112 S. W. 1087, 87 Ark. 221. And to sell on credit, a sale for the amount in cash is unauthorized. Jackson v. Marohn (S. D. Sup. '09), 119 N. W. 988.

Where land is entrusted to real estate agents to sell and collect the purchase money, the purchaser is entitled to credit for payment to an agent of the real estate agents, although made after he was discharged, he having been held out as authorized to receive payments due on contracts, and notice of the withdrawal of his authority not having been given to the purchaser. Meeker v. Manning, 162 I11. 203, 44 N. E. 397. See also Sec. 335.

Defendant made plaintiff his agent for the sale of certain lands for cash, all the price above a certain amount to belong to plaintiff as his compensation; plaintiff found a purchaser willing to pay such sum in cash and the excess to plaintiff on time. Held, that such sale complied with the terms of the agreement. Van Garder v. Sherman, 81 Iowa, 403, 46 N. W. 1087.