By the terms of the contract of employment between the owners of land and a broker, commissions became due upon withdrawal of the property from sale within a certain time. Held, that the notice recited that it was given under the contract by the owner to the broker not to sell said land, that it had been withdrawn from the market within that time, while the owner was repudiating a sale by the broker, was a withdrawal of the premises from sale by entitling the broker to his commissions, not as damages for a breach of the contract but as a debt. Maze v. Gordon, 96 Cal. 61, 30 P. 962; Gamble v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co., 158 Fed. 49, 89 C. C. A. 379. Compare Secs. 132, 585. See also Sec. 557.