In an action by brokers on a contract whereby they agreed to procure for defendant a customer for her property at a specified price, a complaint alleging a compliance with the contract by plaintiffs was not demurrable for failing to allege that the customer was ready, able and willing topay for the property. Luns-ford v. Bailey, 142 Ala. 319, 38 S. 362; Keinath, Schuster & Hudson v. Reed, 137 P. 841, 18 N. M. 358.

A complaint pleading employment as a broker to sell land for a commission on amount collected by him from purchasers, under agreement that defendant should give at least one week's notice in writing to plaintiff of defendant's intention to cancel any contract procured by him for default by purchasers, and alleging cancellation without notice to him, of contracts procured by him, and claiming as damages the percentage which he would have received on payment by the purchasers of the unpaid instalments, etc., is sufficient as against demurrer, though it fails to allege the financial ability of the purchasers to pay the unpaid instalments. Benequit v. N. Y. & N. J. Real Estate Imp. Co., 133 N Y. Sup. 226, 148 App. Div. 628.

Where it is alleged that the seller actually sold the premises to a purchaser with whom the broker was negotiating upon the specified terms, it is not necessary to allege that the proposed purchaser was ready, able and willing to buy. Williams v. Atkinson, 214 S. W. 504, - Tex. Civ. App. - .