![]() |
![]() |
Free Books / Real Estate / American Law Of Real Estate Agency / | ![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Sec. 706. Burden On Plaintiff To Show Double Employment Was With Defendant's Knowledge And Consent |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
This section is from the book "American Law Of Real Estate Agency", by William Slee Walker. Also available from Amazon: American law of real estate agency.
The burden of showing that one employing a broker to find a customer to exchange real estate with him had notice that the broker was to receive a commission from the customer is on the broker. Hannan v. Prentis, 124 Mich. 417, 83 N. W. 102; Robinson v. Clock, 55 N. Y. S. 976, 38 App. Div. 67; Stapp v. Godfrey, 139 N. W. 158, 158 Iowa, 376; Thomas v. Wychoff, 174 N W. 26, - Iowa Sup. - . Compare Redmond v. Herke, 137 Iowa, 228, 114 N. W. 885.
 
Continue to:
agent, real estate agency, brokerage, commissions, compensation, contracts, duties, exchanges, exclusive contracts, forms, interpretations, judicial constructions, leases, liabilities of principal, listing, loans, options, contracts, pleadings, practice, law, rights, sales
![]() |
|
|