![]() |
![]() |
Free Books / Real Estate / American Law Of Real Estate Agency / | ![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Sec. 85. Broker Employed To Effect A Sale, Who Secures A Mere Option, Is Not Entitled To Commissions |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
This section is from the book "American Law Of Real Estate Agency", by William Slee Walker. Also available from Amazon: American law of real estate agency.
A broker employed to find an absolute purchaser at a specified price, on terms agreeable to the seller, has not earned a commission by procuring a person who is willing to execute a contract by which it is optional with him to make the payments specified therein, and on his failure to do so the contract to become void and he merely to forfeit the amount, if any paid. Tousey v. Etzel, 9 Utah, 329, 34 P. 291; Hildenbrand v. Lillis, 10 Cal. App. 522, 51 P. 1008; Brown v. Kegan, 32 Colo. 463, 76 P. 1056; Fox v. Denargo Ld. Co., 37 Colo. 203, 86 P. 344; Block v. Ryan, 4 App. Cas. (D. C.) 283; Lawrence v. Bhodes, 188 I11. 96, 58 N. E. 910; Aigler v. Carpenter Pl. Ld. Co., 51 Kan. 718, 33 P. 593; Kimberly v. Henderson, 29 Md. 512; Brown v. Wasner (Wash. Sup. '09), 99 P. 581; Herman v. Fisher, 82 Mich. 208, 46 N. W. 225; Zeidler v. Walker, 41 Mo. App. 118; Stengel v. Sergeant (N. J. Ch. '08), 68 A. 1106; Runyon v. Wilkinson, 57 N. J. L. 420, 31 A. 390; Ward v. Zborowski, 63 N. Y. S. 219, 31 Misc. 66; Walsh v. Gay, 63 N. Y. S. 543, 49 App. Div. 50; Bennett v. Egan, 23 N. Y. S. 154, 3 Misc. 421; Levy v. Eottman, 32 N. Y. S. 241, 11 Misc. 372; Blakely v. Pursell, 90 N. Y. S. 337; Milstein v. Loring, 92 N. Y. S. 417, 102 A. D. 349; Hough v. Baldwin, 103 N. Y. S. 133, 53 Misc. 284; Brackenridge v. Claridge, 91 Tex. 527, 44 S. W. 819, 43 L. R. A. 593; Bunck v. Dimmick (Tex. Civ. App. '08), 111 S. W. 779; Lawrence v. Peterson, 34 Wash. 1, 74 P. 1011; Dwyer v. Baborn, 6 Wash. 213, 33 P. 350; Wilson v. Ellis (Tex. Civ. App. '08), 106 S. W. 1152; Duncan v. Parker, 142 P. 657, 81 Wash. 340, L. R. A. 1915 A, 804; Rehl v. Fanton, 119 P. 400, 17 Cal. App. 247; Dreyfus v. Richardson, 130 P. 161, 20 Cal. App. 800; Kinney v. Eckenberger, 145 P. 665, 74 Or. 442; Dinkelspiel v. v. Nason, 120 P. 789, 17 Cal. App. 591; Stelson v. Haigler, 165 P. 265, - Colo. Sup. -; Burton v. Rose, 194 S. W. 575, 137 Tenn. 503; Dodge v. Lacey, 216 S. W. 400, - Tex. Civ. App. - . See also Sec. 90.
 
Continue to:
agent, real estate agency, brokerage, commissions, compensation, contracts, duties, exchanges, exclusive contracts, forms, interpretations, judicial constructions, leases, liabilities of principal, listing, loans, options, contracts, pleadings, practice, law, rights, sales
![]() |
|
|