![]() |
![]() |
Free Books / Real Estate / American Law Of Real Estate Agency / | ![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Sec. 948. Instruction That, If By The Terms Of The Contract |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||
This section is from the book "American Law Of Real Estate Agency", by William Slee Walker. Also available from Amazon: American law of real estate agency.
the broker had nothing to do, there was no consideration for the promise, is proper.
In an action for real estate commissions, defendant is entitled to an instruction that if, by the terms of the contract, it is shown that there was nothing for the brokers to do, then the promise to pay them commissions was without consideration and void. Wolff v. Denboskey, 74 N. Y. S. 565, 66 App. Div.
428, 36 Misc. 643.
 
Continue to:
agent, real estate agency, brokerage, commissions, compensation, contracts, duties, exchanges, exclusive contracts, forms, interpretations, judicial constructions, leases, liabilities of principal, listing, loans, options, contracts, pleadings, practice, law, rights, sales
![]() |
|
|