Whether an injunction can be given against a systematic attempt to induce other persons to refrain from future business relations with the party seeking relief, as long as no violence is used, is a question upon which there is some conflict of authority. In some states it is held that an injunction will be granted.1 In some states such conduct is criminal.2 In other states such conduct is held to be a mere exercise of the employes' right of free speech in telling of their grievances; and such conduct will not be enjoined.3

7 Hebner v. Ry., 78 Minn. 280, 79 Am. St. Rep. 387, 80 N. W. 1128.

8 Baker v. Ins. Co. (Ky.), 64 S. W. 013.

9 Trimble v. Ins. Co. (Ky.), 64 S. W. 915.

10Trimble v. Ins. Co. (Ky.), 64 S. W. 915.

11 See Sec. 2425.

1 California. Goldberg v. Stablemen's Union, 140 Cal. 420, 117 Am. St. Rep. 45, 8 L. R. A. (N.S.) 460, 86 Pac. 806.

Michigan. Beck v. Protective Union,

118 Mich. 407, 74 Am. St. Rep. 421, 42 L. R. A. 407, 77 N. W. 13.

Minnesota. Roraback v. Motion Picture Machine Operators' Union, 140 Minn. 481, 3 A. L. R. 1200, 168 N. \Y. 766, 160 N..W. 520.

New Jersey. Barr v. Trades' Council, 53 N. J. Eq. 101, 111, 30 Atl. 881, 884; Martin v. McFall, 65 N. J. Eq. 01, 55 Atl. 465.

Oregon. Longshore Printing Co. v. Howell, 26 Or. 527, 46 Am. St. Rep. 640, 28 L. R. A. 464, 38 Pac. 547.