This section is from the book "American Law Of Real Estate Agency", by William Slee Walker. Also available from Amazon: American law of real estate agency.
It is for the jury to determine whether plaintiff was employed as a broker and authorized to perform the acts for which he claims compensation; in case of a conflict of testimony it is error for the court to direct a verdict. Stephens v. Bailey, 149 Ala. 256; 42 S. 740; Byan v. Page, 123 Iowa, 246, 98 N. W. 768; Monk v. Parker, 180 Mass. 246, 63 N. E. 793; Codd v. Seitz, 94 Mich. 191, 53 N. W. 1057; Merriam v. Johnson, 86 Minn. 61, 90 N. W. 116; Cody v. Dempsey, 83 N. Y. S. 899, 86 App. Div. 335; Reddin v. Dam, 64 N. Y. S. 611, 51 App. Div. 636; Moore v. Boehm,, 26 N. Y. S. 67, 6 Misc. 38;
Tieck v. McKenna, 101 N. Y. S. 317, 115 App. Div. 701; Black v. Snook, 204 Pa. St. 119, 53 A. 648; Dixon v. Daub, 17 Pa. Super. Ct. 168; Center v. Conglomerate Min. Co., 23 Utah, 165, 64 P. 362; Myers v. Kilgin, 160 S. W. 569, 177 Mo. App. 524; Tupy v. Cech, 199 I11. App. 496; Levine v. Cray, 176 N. Y. Sup. 77.
 
Continue to: