In an action on notes defendant pleaded in reconvention that she had given plaintiff certain money to loan for her, but which, through his negligence, she had lost; the evidence tended to prove that plaintiff had received a commission from the borrower for making the loan. Held, an instruction that if plaintiff received a profit from the lending he was bound to use the greatest degree of care that an ordinarily prudent person would exercise under like circumstances, was erroneous, as requiring too high a degree of care; plaintiff, as bailee or broker, being only required to exercise the care of an ordinarily prudent person. Caruthers v. Boss (Tex. Civ. App. '01), 63 S. W. 911.