In an action for the commissions of a real estate broker, instructions that if plaintiff and another broker both had the premises for sale, and the other first directed the purchaser's attention to the property, and first visited the property with him, he was entitled to the commissions, though plaintiff afterwards took the purchaser to the property and introduced him to the owner, were erroneous, because authorizing a finding against plaintiff, though he was the procuring cause of sale, and as such entitled to compensation. Bowser v. Mich, 29 Ind. App. 49, 62 N. E. 513.