China and Japan. First period.

Buddhism.

In China and Japan things were very different. Following Mr. Anderson's invaluable work, the "Pictorial Arts of Japan," we find that their history of pictorial art begins about a.d. 457. Mr. Anderson thinks, however, that art was only actually planted in Japan with the introduction of Buddhism in the sixth century. Then it begins badly, for it was under the influence of religion, and in fact we read that the earliest art consisted of Buddhist images and mural decorations. This religious influence, together with a servile imitation of the Chinese masters, so enslaved art, that no development of importance took place till the end of the ninth century.

The "Ni O"

Looking at the plate of the "Ni O, - a wooden statue - considered the greatest work of the time, we can see the artist had really struggled to interpret nature, and no doubt studies were made from the nude, for the work on the anatomy could not otherwise have been so well expressed; but, good as it is, it runs in the Michael Angelo spirit, is exaggerated, and lacks entirely all the greatness of the Greek sculpture. This work the greatest of what Mr. Anderson has called the first period - shows that there had been a struggle towards the expression of nature.

Second Period

Nobuzane.

The second period, we learn, ends with the fourteenth century, and is parallel, therefore, with the European mediaeval period. On comparing plates of the Japanese work with that of the same period in Europe, we are forced to give the palm to the Japanese artists, they were, in fact, vastly superior, In looking at the plate of "The Death of Kose No Hirotaka" we cannot but feel there was much more respect for nature in Japan than there was in Europe at that time, notwithstanding the fact that Buddhism bore the same relation to art in Japan as Christianity did in Europe. We read also that in the twelfth century there was one, Nobuzane, who had a brilliant reputation for "portraits and ether studies from Nature." The specimen of Nobuzane's work is admirable in expression, he has caught the living expression of his model, but the rest is conventional.

Chinese Renascence

We are told that the Chinese renascence began about 1275, and that the painters of this movement were naturalistic, "Ink sketches of birds and bamboos, portraits and landscapes were the subjects chosen," and though these were only a kind of picture-writing, yet the movement led the artists more and more to study nature.

Third Period

Meicho

Shia-bun.

Soga Jasoku.

Coming now to Mr. Anderson's third period, from the end of the fourteenth century to the last quarter of the eighteenth, we find that Meicho seems to have been to Japanese art what Giotto was to European art, and at about the same period. We read further on that in the early part of the fifteenth century the revived Chinese movement referred to made its influence felt in Japan. An example given by Mr. Anderson of Shiubun's idealized landscape painting, while far from satisfactory or even pleasing, is, we venture to think, superior to the work of Giotto. Therein is shown some power, and there is not the childishness which is visible in Giotto's work. Much more naturalistic, powerful, and pleasing are the works of Soga Jasoku, fifteenth-century Chinese school. These landscapes show the artist had a feeling for nature, and although he attempted in the upper plate (Plate 16) what we consider to be beyond the scope of art, yet in the lower the master-hand shows itself. There is atmosphere in the picture. Close observation of nature resulted in a grasp of subtlest movement and expression. Witness the "Falcon and Egret" by Soga Chokuan (sixteenth century), where the power shown in depicting the grasp of the falcon's talon as it mercilessly crushes the helpless egret, is very great. Then look at the paintings of birds in any of our books, and see how wooden, how lifeless they are, compared with even the sixteenth-century Japanese representations of bird life.

Soga Chokuan. Sesshiu

Sesshiu, we are told, was another great painter, and the founder of a school (1420 - 1509). This great man, we are told, "did not follow in the footsteps of the ancients, but developed a style peculiar to himself. His power was greatest in landscape, after which he excelled most in figures, then in flowers and birds- and later on, we are told, in animals. He preferred working in monochrome, and it is said asserted "the scenery of nature was his final teacher,"

Kano School

Then came the Kano School, all of whose artists evidently struggled for Naturalism, and had great power of expression of movement but not of form. The leader, we are told, was an eclectic, and painted Chinese landscapes in Japan, so that he must have neglected nature, and his works belong to the so-called imaginative or unnatural school. The best men of this period were decidedly impressionists, and their chief aim seems to have been to give the impression of the scene and neglect the details, and it is perfectly marvellous how well they succeeded in depicting movement by a very few lines. The "Rain Scene" by Kano Tanyu is a fine example of this.

We read that the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were periods of decadence; we conclude therefore that in Japan art reached its highest state during the second period, under Shiubun, Soga Jasoku, Sesshiu and Tanyu, who were all students of nature, and several of whom would have been called impressionists had they painted in these days.