Where the evidence shows that plaintiff, while negotiating a trade between defendant, owner of a flat building, and owner of a farm, was informed by letter that they could not make a trade, and defendant was so notified, and it further appears that a trade was subsequently effected by another agent, who had previously offered the same farm, though it had not been known by defendant that the farms were the same, a verdict for defendant is against the manifest weight of the evidence. Tomascwski v. Anderson, 172 I11. App. 274; Donnell v. First Mtge. & R. E. Co., 153 N. Y. Sup. 218; Paulson v. Rourke, 145 P. 711, 26 Colo. App. 488; Knotts v. L. 8. & M. S. R. Co., 172 I11. App. 550.