Defendant entrusted to plaintiffs the leasing of certain property, offering to erect a building thereon for the tenant under a long lease. Other parties had come to plaintiffs to find them a building suitable for their purpose. Plaintiffs brought these parties and defendant together; the matter was discussed and an arrangement for a twenty years' lease effected, the contract being drawn by plaintiffs; difficulties occurred in the arrangements, owing to the necessity of a fireproof building, and an increased rental to which the proposed tenants objected; but this difficulty was bridged over by the plaintiffs' efforts, who were in telegraphic communication with defendant. Held, that the evidence did not show that plaintiffs were acting to such an extent in the interest of the tenants, as well as in the interest of the de-defendant, as to preclude the recovery of commissions. Rutledge v. Neely, 99 Mo. App. 384, 73 S. W. 359.