In an action by a broker for commissions for finding a purchaser for defendant's land, plaintiff claimed that defendant had been required to give an abstract of title, which he had not done, hence defeating the sale; defendant denied that he had been "requested;" but his evidence showed that the abstract "had been required," and the contract with the broker provided that "if required," an abstract should be furnished. Held, that defendant could not complain of the refusal of an instruction that, if defendant was not requested to furnish an abstract, plaintiff was not entitled to recover. Bruce v. Wolfe, 102 Mo. App. 384, 76 S. W. 723.