The statute De Donis describes the things on which it may operate as "tenements," and, as a general rule, all "hereditaments which savour of the realty" are regarded as tenements for this purpose. This includes land and things "of a real nature," such as profits from the land, or rents issuing therefrom.4 Terms for years and personal chattels cannot be entailed, and such an attempted limitation will vest an absolute interest in the donee.5

1. Lawlor v. Holohan, 70 Conn. 87, 38 Atl. 90; Fowler v. Duhme, 143 Ind. 248, 42 N. E. 623; Collins v. Collins, 116 Iowa 703, 88 N. W. 1097; Vanderzee v. Slingerland, 103 N. Y. 47, 57 Am. Rep. 701, 8 N. E. 247; Stakes v. Weston, 142 N. Y. 433, 37 N. E. 515; Morrison v Truby, 145 Pa., St. 540, 22 Atl. 972; Neubert v. Colwell, 219 Pa. 248, 68 Atl. 673; Meacham v. Graham, 98 Tenn. 190, 39 S. W. 12; Frank v. Frank, 120 Tenn., 569, 111 S. W. 1119; Lovas v. Olson, 92 Wis. 616, 67 N. W. 605; See In re Johnson, 23 R. I. 1ll, 49 Atl. 695.

2. Post Sec. 32 note 38.

3. That the operation of such a gift is not ordinarily to be so restricted, see O'Mahoney v. Burdett, L. R. 7 H. L. 388; Ingram v. Soutten, L. R. 7 H. L. 408; Britton v. Thornton, 112 U. S. 526, 28 L. Ed. 816; Fifer v. Allen, 228 111. 507, 81 N. E. 1105; Gavvin v. Carroll, 276 111. 478, 114 N. E.

927; Guilford v. Gardner 180 la, 1210, 162 N. W. 261; Harvey v. Bell, 118 Ky. 512, 81 S. W. 671; Buchanan v. Buchanan, 99 N. C. 308, 5 S. E. 430; Kaser v. Kaser, 68 Ore. 153, 137 Pac. 187.

3a. Harrington v. Cooper, 126 Ark. 53, 189 S. W. 667; Sumpter v. Carter, 115 Ga. 893; 60 L. R. A. 274, 42 S. E. 324; Cain v. Robertson, 27 Ind. App. 198, 61 N. E. 26; Bradshaw v. Williams, 140 Ky. 160, 130 S. W. 985; Harvey v. Bell, 118 Ky. 512, 81 S. W. 671; Booth v. Eberly, 124 Md. 22, 91 Atl. 767; In re Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 189 N. Y. 202, 82 N. E. 181; Mayer v. Walker, 214 Pa. 440, 63 Atl. 1011; Church v. Baer, 236 Pa. 605, 84 Atl. 1099; Blum v. Evans, 10 S. C. 56; Meek v. Trotter, 133 Tenn. 145, 180 S. W. 176, Contra in England, O'Mahoney v. Burdett, L. R. 7 H. L. 388.

And see Fifer v. Allen, 228 111. 507, 81 N. E. 1105.