This section is from the book "A Library Of Wonders And Curiosities Found In Nature And Art, Science And Literature", by I. Platt. Also available from Amazon: A library of wonders and curiosities.
The following article is not of a pleasing description, but nevertheless proper to be inserted in "The Book of Curiosities." It is Anthropophagi, or Men-eaters :
The Cyclops, the Lestrygons, and Scylla, are all represented in Homer as Anthropophagi, or man-eaters, and the female phantoms, Circe and the Syrens, first bewitched with a show of pleasure, and then destroyed. This, like the other parts of Homer's poetry, had a foundation in the manners of the times preceding his own. It was still in many places the age spoken of by Orpheus,
"When men devour'd each other like the beasts, Gorging on hamman flesh."
History gives us divers instances of persons driven by excess of hunger to eat their own relations. And also out of revenge and hatred, where soldiers, in the heat of battle, have been known to be carried to such an excess of rage, as to tear their enemies with their teeth.
The violence of love has sometimes produced the same effect as the excess of hatred.
Among the Essedonian Scythians, when a man's father died, his neighbours brought him several beasts, which they killed, mixed up their flesh with that of the deceased, and made a feast.
Among the Massageti, when any person grew old, they killed him, and ate his flesh ; but if the party died of sickness, they buried him, esteeming him unhappy.
Idolatry and superstition have caused the eating more human flesh, than both love and hatred put together.
There are few nations but have offered human victims to their deities ; and it was an established custom to eat part of the sacrifices they offered.
It appears pretty certain, from Dr. Hawkesworth's account of the voyages to the South Seas, that the inhabitants of New Zealand ate the bodies of their enemies. Mr. Petit has a learned dissertation on the nature and manners of the Anthropophagi. Among other things, he disputes whether or no the Anthropophagi act contrary to nature ? The philosophers, Diogenes, Chrysippus, and Zeno, followed by the whole body of Stoics, held it a very reasonable thing for men to eat each other.
According to Sextus Empiricus, the first laws were those made to prevent men from eating each other, as had been done until that time.
The Greek writers represent Anthropophagi as universal before Orpheus.
Leonardus Floroventius informs us, that having fed a hog with hog's flesh, and a dog with dog's flesh, he found a repugnance in nature to such food ; the former lost all his bristles ; the latter its hair, and the whole body broke out in blotches.
If even this horrid practice of eating human flesh originates from hunger, still it must be perpetuated from revenge : as death must lose much of its horror among; those who are accustomed to eat the dead ; and where there is little horror at the sight of death, there must be less repugnance to murder.
 
Continue to: