1. References

Constitutional History: T. P. Taswell-Langmead, English Constitutional History; Hannis Taylor, Origin and Growth of the English Constitution, Introd. and ch. i; John Fiske, Beginnings of New England, ch. i; J. R. Tucker, Constitution, chs. i, iv; J. I. C. Hare, Constitutional Law, chs. i, iii, viii; J. F. Jameson, Essays in Constitutional History; James Wilson, Lectures on Jurisprudence (Andrew's ed.).

written and Unwritten Constitutions: W. C. Morey, Genesis of a written Constitution (Am. Acad, of Pol. Sci. Annals, I, 529); Brooks Adams, Embyro of a Commonwealth [Atlantic Monthly, LIV, 610); J. H. Robinson, Original and Derived Features of the Constitution (Am. Acad, of Pol. Sci. Annals, I, 203); A. V. Dicey, The Law of the (British) Constitution, Introd. and chs. i, xv; T. M. Cooley, Comparative Merits of Written and Prescriptive Constitutions (Am. Law Rev., XXIII, 311); J. H. Burgess, Political Science and Constitutional Law, I, 137-154; Emlin McClain, Unwritten Constitutions in the United States (Harv. Law Rev. XV, 531); S. G. Fisher, Evolution of the Constitution of the United States; Charles Borgeaud, adoption and Amendment of Constitutions.

Sovereignty: T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, chs. iii, vii; J. A. Jameson, Constitutional Conventions, ch. ii; P. Bliss, Sovereignty; J. A. Jameson, National Sovereignty (Pel, Sci. Quart. V, 193); J. C. Hurd, Theory of Our National Existence; J. Dewey, Austin's Theory of Sovereignty (Pol. Sci. Quart., IX, 31); D. G. Ritchie, Conception of Sovereignty (Am. Acad, of Pol. Sci. Annals, I, 385); W. W. Willoughby, Nature of the State, ch. ix; Henry Sidgwick, Elements of Politics, ch. xxxi; Theodore Woolsey, Political Science, §§ 72, 73; W. O. Bateman, Political and Constitutional Law of the United Stales; I. B. Richman, Erom John Austin to John C. Hurd (Harv. Law Rev. XIV, 353); L B. Richman, Law and Political Fact in the United States (Atlantic Monthly, LXIV, 205).

Unconstitutionality of Statutes: Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution, §§ 373-456; T. M. Cooley, Constitutional Limitations, ch. vii; The Federalist, No. 78; J. B. Thayer, Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law (Harv. Law Rev., VII, 129); T. M. Cooley, Federal Supreme Court - Its place in the American Constitutional System (Pol. Sci. Lectures, Univ. of Mich., 1889); A. B. Hart, Actual Government (Am. Citizen Series), §§ 135-146; J. B. Thayer, Cases on Constitutional Law, I, notes pp. 146-154, 157, 175, 183; Marbury v. Madison (1803, ICranch, 137; 1 Curtis' Decisions, 368; Thayer's Cases, 107; McClain's Cases, 815; Boyd's Cases, 17; Marshall's Decisions, Dillon's ed., 1); Eakin v. Raub (Pa. 1825, 12 Serg. & Rawle, 330; Thayer's Cases, 133); Opinion of the Justices (1878, 126 Mass. 557; Thayer's Cases, 178); In the Matter of the Application of the Senate (1865, 10 Minn. 78; Thayer's Cases, 181).

Initiative and Referendum: E. P. Oberholzer, Referendum in America; James Bryce, American Commonwealth, I, ch. xxxix; T. A. Sherwood, Initiative and Referendum under the United States Constitution (Centr. Law Jour. LVI (1903), 247); Kadderly v. Portland (Oregon, 1903, 44 Oreg. 118).