The court of review will not entertain assignment of errors on the rulings of the trial court in the selection of a jury if the accused did not exhaust the num- 19 Ill. Stat., Chap. 38, Div. 13, Sec. 12.

20 State vs. Cadv, 80 Me., 413; People vs. O'Loughlin, 3 Utah, 133; Hughes' Cr. Law, Secs. 2935, 2936.

21 Matson vs. People, 15 Ill., 536; People vs. Welmer, 110 Mich., 248.

22 Hughes' Cr. Law, Sec. 2938;

State vs. Spaulding, 60 Vt., 228; Rogers vs. State, 89 Md., 424. 23 People vs. Dolan, 57 Mich., 610;

Hughes' Cr. Law, Sec. 2938. 24 Hughes' Cr. Law, Sec. 2940;

Donovan vs. People, 139 Ill., 414ber of peremptory challenges allowed him by the law.25 Any error with respect to challenges in the empaneling of a jury should be disregarded, unless an objectionable juror was forced upon the defendant after the exhaustion of his peremptory challenges.26