The fact of guilty knowledge may be established by circumstantial evidence.74 The declarations and conduct of the accused may be shown in evidence as tending to prove his guilty knowledge.75

Evidence that the accused had received other stolen goods from the same thief, knowing the same to have been stolen, is competent.76

68 4 Blackstone, 132.

69 Tobin vs. People, 104 Ill., 567;

Kotter vs. People, 150 Ill., 441; People vs. Hawkins, 34 Cal., 181; People vs. Ward, 105 Cal., 652; Sermon vs. State (Ind.), 62 N. E., 525;, Stone vs. Com. (Ky.), 67 S. W., 841.

70 Edwards vs. State, 80 Ga., 127.

71 Williams vs. People, 101 Ill., 382; People vs. Montague, 71 Mich., 318; State vs. Kinder, 22 Mont., 516.

72 Cohn vs. People, 197 Ill., 484; Williams vs. People, 101 Ill., 382; State vs. Caveness, 78 N. C, 484.

73 Huggins vs. People, 135 Ill., 243.

74 Delahoyde vs. People, 212 Ill., 554; Huggins vs. People, 135 Ill., 243, 249; Gunther vs. People, 139 Ill., 531.

75 Gunther vs. People, 139 Ill., 531; Isaacs vs. People, 118, 111., 538. Com. vs. Billings, 167 Mass., 283; defendant stated that he got the goods from a policeman, and search of the house of the policeman was made and held competent.