An express contract is not necessary to the creation of the bailment relation. This form of contracts, like others, may be created by implication. It is essential that the parties to the contract should have intended a return of the specific thing bailed,11 even if in an altered form.12

7 Loomis vs. Stowe, 72 I11., 623;

Shaw vs. Wilshire, 65 Me., 485; Jarvis vs. Rogers, 15 Mass., 389.

8 5 Cyc, 166; Gittings vs. Nelson,

86 I11., 591; Macombe vs. Parker, 14 Pick. (Mass.) 497.

9 King vs. Richards, 6 Whart.

(Pa.), 418; 37 Am. Dec, 420. 10 Tatum vs. Sharpless, 6 Phila.

(Pa.), 18; 22 Leg. Int. (Pa.),

244; Caldwell vs. Eaton, 5

Mass., 399.