A purchaser from the wife of the lessee of a farm, who has in her possession and control certain personal property, which in fact, is the property of the owner of the farm, cannot claim the right to the goods so purchased as against the owner. The court says in such a case,17 "the facts do not justify the inference that the owner had thereby invested the person in possession of said property, as lessee, with the apparent power to sell, as it is not the common business of persons who are placed in charge of farms to sell the personal property which the owners confide to their custody, for the ordinary and necessary requirements of farms. Persons who purchase such property from them without the necessary evidence of their right to sell, must take the consequences of their own improvidence." The rule as stated above, is the general rule of application in such cases, and unless the owner has done something further to show apparent authority in the lessee in possession, the lessee could convey no title to the property, even to one who buys in good faith, and without notice of the owner's rights.18