An infant partner has the same power as an adult partner to bind the firm; like an adult he has no power to withdraw his capital invested in the firm without the consent of all the other partners, a bill to dissolve and for an accounting being his only remedy. But personally he is not liable for the debts of the firm over and above his capital invested. The same rule probably would hold as to torts committed by other members of the firm for which the firm was liable. The general rule is that partners are liable to be sued jointly or severally in an action for tort, since the partner committing the wrong is the agent of each and every one of the other partners.9 While an infant is liable for a tort committed by himself personally, he is not responsible for torts of negligence committed by those in his service, the doctrine of respondeat superior resting upon the relation of master and servant which depends upon a contract.10 But a partnership is, for all legitimate purposes of its business, a legal entity like a corporation, though it is taken notice of and reached by legal process, only through the personality of its members.11 Hence, an infant partner for a tort committed or directed by him would be personally liable to the injured party, and for other torts for which the firm was liable, his liability would extend to the amount of his capital invested in like manner as for a debt of the firm.