Sec. 368. Damage
Description
This section is from the book "The Law Of Contracts", by William Herbert Page. Also available from Amazon: Commercial Contracts: A Practical Guide to Deals, Contracts, Agreements and Promises.
Sec. 368. Damage
The proposition that damage is a necessary element of misrepresentation means nothing more than this: that the party seeking relief must, by reason of the misrepresentation,
11 Mt. Hope Nurseries Co. v. Jackson, 36 Okla. 273, 45 L. R. A. (N.S.) 243, 128 Ac. 250.
12 Hollerbach v. United States, 233 U. S. 165, 58 L. ed. 898.
13 Buchanan v. Burnett, 102 Tex. 402, 119 S. W. 1141.
14 Mamlock v. Fairbanks, 46 Wis. 415, 32 Am. Rep. 716, 1 N. W. 167; 0. L.
Packard Machinery Co. v. Schweiger, 147 Wis. 67, 132 N. W. 606.
15 O. L. Packard Machinery Co. v. Schweiger, 147 Wis. 67, 132 N. W. 600.
16 Mamlock v. Fairbanks, 46 Wis. 415, 32 Am. Rep. 716, 1 N. W. 167.
17 See Sec. 246, 249 and 262 et seq.
18 See Sec. 262 et seq.
19 Mamlock v. Fairbanks, 46 Wis. 415, 32 Am. Rep. 716, 1 N. W. 187.
Continue to:
My Books
