(Ky.), 51 S. W. 799. By this rule is possibly modified by the Act of 1894, under which she can only secure the debt of another by setting aside specific property for such debt, not incurring any personal liability therein. Skinner v. Lynn (Ky.), 51 S. W. 167. The statement in Lane v. Bank (Ky.), 43 S. W. 442, that she cannot be a surety under such a decree is an obiter. In Mundo v. Anderson, 109 Ky. 147; 58 S. W. 520, it is held that after such decree she may be surety even under the Act of 1894.

10 Bidwell v. Robinson, 79 Ky. 29.

11 Richardson v. Stephens, 122 Ala. 301; 25 So. 39; Schenig v. Cofer, 97 Ala. 726; 12 So. 414; Finch v. Barclay, 87 Ga. 393; 13 S. E. 566; Strickland v. Vance, 99 Ga. 531; 59 Am. St. Rep. 241; 27 S. E. 152; Smith v. Hardman, 99 Ga. 381; 27 S. E. 731; Munroe v. Haas, 105 Ga. 468; 30 S. E. 654; Coffee v. Ramey, 111 Ga. 817; 35 S. E. 641; Cook v. Buhrlage, 159 Ind. 162; 64 X. E. 603; Andrysiak v. Satkoski, 159 Ind. 428; 63 N. E. 854; 65 N. E. 286; International, etc, Association v. Watson, 158 Ind. 508; 64 X. E. 23; Seigman v.

Streeter, 64 X. J. L. 169; 44 Atl. 888; Pittman v. Raysor, 49 S. C. 469; 27 S. E. 475.

12 Storrs, etc., Co. v. Wingate, 67 N. H. 190; 29 Atl. 413.

13 Cook v. Buhrlage, 159 Ind. 162; 64 X. E. 603; Field v. Noblett, 154 Ind. 357; 56 X. E. 841; Bowles v. Trapp, 139 Ind. 55; 38 N. E. 406; Goff v. Hankins, 11 Ind. App. 456; 39 N. E. 294; Read v. Brewer (Miss.), 16 So. 350; Simon v. Sabb, 56 S. C. 38; 33 S. E. 799; Griffin v. Earle, 34 S. C. 246; 13 S. E. 473.

14 Sidway v. Nichol, 62 Ark. 146; 34 S. W. 529; Morningstar v. Hard-wick, 3 Ind. App. 431; 29 X. E. 929; Shaw v. Fortine. 98 Mich. 254; 57 X. W. 128; Schmidt v. Spencer, 87 Mich. 121; 49 X. W. 479.

15 Witkowski v. Maxwell, 69 Miss. 56; 10 So. 453.

16 Harrisburg, etc., Bank v. Brad-shaw, 178 Pa. St. 180; 34 L. R. A. 597; 35 Atl. 629; even if she was originally liable only as accommodation indorser, and she was released by failure to protest in time.

17 Jones v. Rice, 92 Ga. 236; 18 S. E. 348; Waldrop v. Beal, 89 Ga. 306; 15 S. E. 310.

18 Taylor v. Mortgage Co., 10G Ga. 238; 32 S. E. 153; Daniel v. Royce, 96 Ga. 566; 23 S. E, 493.

19 Koh-i-noor Laundry Co. v. Lockwood, 141 Ind. 140; 40 N. E. 677.

20 Whelpley v. Stoughton, 112 Mich. 594; 70 N. W. 1098.

21 Thornton v. Lemon, 114 Ga. 155; 39 S. E. 943.

22 Hill v. Cooley, 112 Ga. 115; 37 S. E. 109.

23 Mitchell v. Richmond, 164 Pa. St. 566; 30 Atl. 486.

24 Crenshaw v. Collier, 70 Ark. 5; 65 S. W. 709.

25 Christensen v. Wells, 52 S. C. 497; 30 S. E. 611.

26 Strickland v. Gray, 98 Ga. 667; 27 S. E. 155.

27 Beberdick v. Crevier. 60 N. J. L. 389; 37 Atl. 959.

28 Bishop v. Bourgeois. 58 N. J. Eq. 417; 43 Atl. 655.

29 Lanier v. Olliff, 117 Ga. 397; 43 S. E. 711.

30 Vliet v. Eastburn, 64 N. J. L. 627; sub nomine Eastburn v. Vliet, 46 Atl. 735, 1061. She was held liable on a note of $2,080 because she received a note of $80. So Wool-verton v. Van Syckel, 57 N. J. L. 393; 31 Atl. 603.

31 Maddox v. Wilson, 91 Ga. 39; 16 S. E. 213; Arthur v. Caverly, 98 Mich. 82; 56 N. W. 1102.

32 McDonald v. Bluthenthal, 117 Ga. 120; 43 S. E. 422; Kriz v. Peege, 119 Wis. 105; 95 N. W. 108.

33 Hamil v. Mortgage Co., 127 Ala. 90; 28 So. 558; McCrory v. Grandy, 92 Ga. 319; 18 S. W. 65; McCoy v. Barns, 136 Ind. 378; 36 N. E. 134; State ex rel. Morris v. Frazier, 134 Ind. 648; 34 N. E. 636; Iona, etc., Bank v. Boynton, 69 N. H. 77; 39 Atl. 522; Todd v. Bailey, 58 N. J. L. 10; 32 Atl. 696.

34 Chastain v. Peak, 111 Ga. 889; 36 S. E. 967; First, etc., Bank v. Hunton, 69 N. H. 509; 45 Atl. 351.

35 Nelms v. Keller, 103 Ga. 745; 30 S. E. 572.

36 Kitchen v. Chapin, 64 Neb. 144; 97 Am. St. Rep. 637; 57 L. R. A. 914; 89 N. W. 632.

37 First, etc., Bank v. Hunton, 6!) X. H. 509; 45 Atl. 351.

38 First, etc., Bank v. Hanscom, 104 Mich. 67; 62 N. W. 167.

39 Fisk v. Mills, 104 Mich. 433; 62 N. W. 559.

40 Emerson, etc., Co. v. Knapp, 90 Wis. 34; 62 N. W. 945.

41 Merchants', etc., Association v. Jarvis, 92 Ky. 566; 18 S. W. 454; Magill v. Trust Co., 81 Ky. 129; Hirshman v. Brashears, 79 Ky. 258.

42 Hounshell v. Ins. Co., 81 Ky. 304.

43 Continental, etc., Bank v. Clark, 117 Ala. 292; 22 So. 988; National etc., Bank v. Whicher, 173 Mass. 517; 73 Am. St. Rep. 317; 53 N. E. 1004.

44 Richardson v. Stephens, 114

Ala. 238; 21 So. 949; Wiltbank v. Tobler, 181 Pa. St. 103; 37 Atl. 188.

45 Elston v. Corner, 108 Ala. 76; 19 So. 324.

46 Scott v. Taul, 115 Ala. 529; 22 So. 447; Venable v. Lippold, 102 Ga. 208; 29 S. E. 181 (where she was a joint maker).

47 Leschen v. Guy, 149 Ind. 17; 48 N. E. 344; Voreis v. Nussbaum, 131 Ind. 267; 16 L. R. A. 45; 31 N. E. 70.

48 McVey v. Cantrell, 70 N. Y. 295; 26 Am. Rep. 605; Bratton v. Lowry, 39 S. C. 383; 17 S. E. 832.

49 Hackettstown, etc., Bank v. Ming, 52 N. J. Eq. 156; 27 Atl. 920.