37 Sherman v. Connor, 88 Tex. 35; 29 S. W. 1053.

38 Edison, etc., Electric Co. v. Navigation Co., 8 Wash. 370; 40 Am. St. Rep. 910; 24 L. R. A. 315; 36 Pac. 260.

39 Edison, etc., Electric Co. v. Navigation Co., 8 Wash. 370; 40 Am. St. Rep. 910; 24 L. R. A. 315; 36 Pac. 260.

1 Campbell Printing Press Co. v. Thorp, 36 Fed. 414; 1 L. R. A. 645; Williams Mfg. Co. v. Brass Co., 173 Mass. 356; 53 N. E. 862; Sullivan v. Ross, 124 Mich. 287; 82 N. W. 1071; Pennington v. Howland, 21 R. I. 65; 79 Am. St. Rep. 774; 41 Atl. 891; Osborne v. Francis. 38 W. Va. 312; 45 Am. St. Rep. 859; 18 S. E. 591. "It may be that the plaintiff was injudicious or indiscreet in undertaking to labor and furnish materials f(u a compensation, the payment of which was made dependent on a contingency so hazardous or doubtful as the approval or satisfaction of a party particularly in interest. But of that he was the sole judge. Against the consequences resulting from his own bargain the law can afford him no relief. Having voluntarily assumed the obligations and risk of the contract, his legal rights are to be ascertained and determined solely according to its provisions." MoOar-ren v. McNulty, 7 Gray (Mass.) 139 141; quoted in Campbell Printing Press Co. v. Thorp. 36 Fed. 414, 415; 1 L. R. A. 645.

2 Gibson v. Parnage. 39 Mirh. 49; 33 Am. Rep. 351.

3 Campbell Printing Press Co. v. Thorp, 36 Fed. 414; 1 L. R. A. 645; Silsby Mfg. Co. v. Chico. 24 Fed. 893; Worthington v. Gwin, 119 Ala. 44; 43 L. R. A. 382; 24 So. 739; Electric Lighting Co. v. Elder, 115 Ala. 138; 21 So. 983; Adams, etc.. Works v. Schnader, 155 Pa. St. 394; 35 Am. St. Rep. 893; 26 Atl. 745; Singerly v. Thayer, 108 Pa. 291; 56 Am. Rep. 207; 2 Atl. 230; McClure v. Briggs, 58 Vt. 82; 56 Am. Rep. 557; 2 Atl. 583; Daggett v. Johnson. 49 Vt 345; Exhaust Ventilator Co. v. Ry., 66 Wis. 218; 57 Am. Kep. 257, 28 N. W. 343.

4 Zaleski v. Clark. 44 Conn. 218; 26 Am. Rep. 446; Brown v. Foster, E Mass. 136; 18 Am. Rep. 463; Walter A. Wood, etc., Co. v. Smith,

50 Mich. 565; 45 Am. Rep. 57; 15 N. W. 906; Gibson v. Carnage. 39 Mich. 49; 33 Am. Rep. 351; Pennington v. Howland. 21 R. I. 65; 79 Am. St. Rep. 774; 41 Atl. 891; McClure Bros. v. Briggs, 58 Vt. 82; 56 Am. Rep. 557; 2 Atl. 583; Daggett v. Johnson. 49 Vt. 345; Hartford Sorghum Mfg. Co. v. Brush, 43 Vt. 528.

5 Pennington v. Howland. 21 R. 1. 65; 79 Am. St. Rep. 774; 41 Atl. 891.

6 Gibson v. Carnage, 39 Mich. 49; 33 Am. Rep. 351.

7 Zaleski v. Clark, 44 Conn. 218; 26 Am. Rep. 446.

8 McNeil v. Armstrong, 81 Fed. 943.

9 Brown v. Foster, 113 Mass. 136; 18 Am. Rep. 463.

10 Daniels v. Decatur County. 99 la. 440: 08 N. W. 718; Sax v. R. R., 125 Mich. 252; 84 Am. St. Rep. 572; 84 N. W. 314; Koehler v. Buhl. 94 Mich. 490; Frary v. Rubber Co.. 52 Minn. 204; 18 L. R. A. 644; 53 N. W. 1150; Rossiter v. Cooper. 23 Vt. 522; Evans v. Bennett. 7 Wis. 404.

11 Bush v. Kolh 2 Colo. App. 48.

12 Koehler v. Buhl, 94 Mich. 490; 54 X. W. 157.

13 Frary v. Rubber Co., 52 Minn.

204; 18 L. R. A. 044; 53 N. W. 1150.

14 Daniels v. Decatur County, 99 la. 440; 68 N. W. 718.

15 Sax v. R. R., 125 Mich. 252; 84 Am. St. Rep. 572; 84 N. W. 314.

16 Magee v. Lumber Co., 78 Minn. 11; 80 X. W. 781.

17 Magee v. Lumber Co., 78 Minn. 11: 80 N. W. 781.

18 Taylor v. Brewer, 1 Maule & S. 290.

19 Butler v. Mill Co., 28 Minn. 205; 41 Am. Rep. 277; 9 N. W. 697.

20 Howe v. Kenyon, 4 Wash. 677; 30 Pae. 1058.

21 Blaine v. Knapp, 140 Mo. 241; 41 S. W. 787. .

22 Adams, etc., Works v. Schnader, 155 Pa. St. 394; 35 Am. St. Rep. 893; 26 Atl. 745; Barrett v. Coke Co., 51 W. Va. 416; 90 Am. St. Rep. 802; 41 S. E. 220; Osborne v. Francis, 38 W. Va. 312; 45 Am. St. Rep. 859; 18 S. E. 591.

23 Barrett v. Coke Co., 51 W. Va. 416; 90 Am. St. Rep. 802; 41 S. E. 220.

24Magee v. Lumber Co., 78 Minn. 11; 80 N. W. 781.

25 Allen v. Compress Co., 101 Ala. 574; 14 So. 362.

26 Adams, etc., Works v. Schnader, 155 Pa. St. 394; 35 Am. St. Rep. 893; 26 Atl. 745. So of a contract to put in a plumbing and heating plant. (Fairmont) Plumbing Co. v. Carr, 54 W. Va. 272; 46 S. E. 458.

27 Campbell Printing Press Co. v. Thorp, 36 Fed. 414; 1 L. R. A. 645.

28 Singerly v. Thayer, 108 Pa. St. 291; 56 Am. Rep. 207.

29 Walter A. Wood, etc., Co. v. Smith, 50 Mich. 565; 45 Am. Rep. 57; 15 N. W. 906.

30 Piano Mfg. Co. v. Ellis, 68 Mich. 101; 35 N. W. 841; Osborne v. Francis, 38 W. Va. 312; 45 Am. St. Rep. 859; 18 S. E. 591.

31McClure v. Briggs, 58 Vt. 82; 56 Am. Rep. 557; 2 Atl. 583.

32 McCarren v. McNulty, 7 Gray (Mass.) 139.

33 Haney-Campbell Co. v. Creamery Association, 119 la. 188; 93 N. W. 297.

34 Adams, etc., Co. v. Schnader, 155 Pa. St. 394; 35 Am. St. Rep. 893: 26 Atl. 745.

35 Campbell Printing Press Co. v. Thorp, 36 Fed. 414; 1 L. R. A. 645.

36 Union Pacific Ry. v. Anderson, 11 Colo. 293; 18 Pac. 24.

37 Keeler v. Clifford, 165 111. 544; 46 N. E. 248; Loekwood Mfg. Co. v. Regulator Co., 183 Mass. 25; 66 N. E. 420; Hawkins v. Graham. 149 Mass. 284; 14 Am. St. Rep. 422: 21 N. E. 312; Bowery National Bank v. Mayor, etc., of New York. 63 N. Y. 336; Richison v. Mead, 11 S. D. 639; 80 N. W. 131.

38 Richison v. Mead, 11 S. D. 639; 80 N. W. 131.

39 Hawkins v. Graham. 149 Mass. 284; 14 Am. St. Rep. 422; 21 X. E. 312.

40 Duplex Safety Boiler Co. v. Garden, 101 N. Y. 387; 54 Am. Rep. 709; 4 X. E. 749.

41 Dall v. Xoble. 116 N. Y. 230; 15 Am. St. Rep. 398: 5 L. R. A. 554; 22 N. E. 406.

42 MeXeil v. Armstrong, 81 Fed. 943.

43 Lockwood Mfg. Co. v. Regulator Co., 183 Mass. 25; 66 N. E. 420.

44 Hartford Sorghum Mfg. Co. v. Brush, 43 Vt. 528.

45 Daggett v. Johnson, 49 Vt. 45.

46 May v. Hoover, 112 Ind. 455; 14 N. E. 472.

47 Moot v. Investment Association, 157 N. Y. 201; 45 L. R. A. 666; 52 N. E. 1.

48 Youglit v. Williams, 120 N. Y. 253: 17 Am. St. Rep. 634; 8 L. R. A. 591; 24 X. E. 195.

49 Gilson v. Bank, 180 Mass. 444; 62 N. E. 728. (The objections to the title appeared to be well taken though technical.)

50 Mullally v. Greenwood, 127 Mo, 138; 48 Am. St. Rep. 613; 29 S. Vv 1001.