This section is from the book "The Elements Of The Science Of Nutrition", by Graham Lusk. Also available from Amazon: The Elements of the Science of Nutrition.
In the historic introduction just given it has been shown that the nitrogen of the urine and feces can be made a measure for the. determination of protein metabolism. It is easy to comprehend that urinary constituents, such as urea, uric acid, the purin bases, creatinin, etc.,- are derived from the metabolism of flesh in the body, whether the flesh be the body's own or that of an animal fed to it. But the intestinal canal where the feces are formed is a long tube open at both ends, through which may pass the nitrogen gas of the air swallowed and indigestible substances such as hair, tacks, etc. In diarrhea the curds of milk, pieces of undigested meat or bread, and large quantities of fat are in evidence. These common observations would seem to justify the popular supposition that normal feces are made up of the undigested residues of the food-stuffs. In truth, however, this is very far from the fact. The feces are chiefly the unabsorbed residues of intestinal excretions.
The collection of the feces for a given period of nutrition is more difficult than the collection of the urine. The urine may be collected every two hours and may fairly represent the protein metabolism of the time, but the feces are normally passed but once a day by a man on a mixed diet, and only once in five days by a dog fed with meat. Furthermore, particles fed to a man are not usually passed in his feces for two or three days. The feces formed during a certain digestive period might therefore leave the body two or three days after the urine was drawn from the bladder. To obtain clear results Voit fed a dog with 60 grams of bones in a preliminary diet eighteen hours before the regular feeding began. These bones yielded a whitish mark in the fecal excretion. All feces subsequent to the mark were attributed to the diet used in the experiment. At the conclusion of the experiment a second diet containing bones was given. The whitish excrement formed from this indicated the end of the feces of the period. For the same purpose Rubner1 gave milk (2 liters) to a man, the last portion of the milk being taken eighteen hours before the commencement of a period of feeding. The milk feces give a distinct whitish dividing line. A teaspoonful of lampblack may also be readily made use of in man and in animals. Cremer2 uses freshly precipitated silicic acid ( 10 to 25 grams mixed with 40 to 100 grams fat) instead of bones. This gives excellent results, as it avoids the albuminoid nitrogen in the bones, and is of great advantage if the calcium or other ash constituents of the feces are to be determined.
In the fundamental experiments Voit found that a fasting dog weighing 30 kilograms excreted 1.88 grams of dry fecal matter per day, containing 0.15 gram of nitrogen. Evidently these starvation feces are not derived from the food, but must be derived from the matter passed from the body into the intestinal canal. An analogous condition is found in the intestinal tract of the newborn infant. The meconium consists principally of the unabsorbed residues of the bile, of glycocholic, taurocholic, and fellic acids, of cholesterin and lecithin, colored by bilirubin or biliverdin. The absence both of putrefaction and the acid of the gastric juice prevents the breaking up and reabsorption of many of these substances, processes which occur soon after birth. The fasting dog of 30 kilograms, mentioned above, excreted 1.88 grams of dry feces, but a fasting dog of 20.3 kilograms may yield 4.3 grams of dry bile solids in twenty-four hours.3 The ordinary starvation feces therefore cannot consist of the total of the excretions from the body into the digestive tract, but are rather their unabsorbed remainder.
When meat was given, Bischoff and Voit4 found that the production of feces was not proportional to the amount of meat. A compilation of the data given by Friedrich Muller1 illustrates the average amount of dry feces produced by a dog weighing 35 kilograms after feeding different quantities of meat:
1 Rubner: "Zeitschrift fur Biologie," 1879, xv, 119.
2 Cremer: Ibid., 1897, xxxv, 391.
3 Voit: Ibid., 1894, xxx, 548.
4 Bischoff and Voit: "Die Ernahrung des Fleischfressers," 1860, p. 291.
Meat in Grams. | Fecal Solids. | Fecal N |
O | 2.0 | 0.15 |
500 | 5.1 | 0.33 |
1000 | 9.2 | 0.60 |
1500 | 10.2 | 0.66 |
2000 | 11.1 | 0.72 |
2500 | 15.4 | 1.00 |
The feces had the same pitch-black color as starvation feces and were similar to the 2 grams of feces which would have been produced by the same dog had be been starving. No muscle-fibers and no protein could be detected. It seemed clear that the meat feces differed from the starvation feces mainly in quantity, and that this quantity was larger because the secretions into the intestines had been stimulated by the passing food.
Fat ingested with the meat in moderate quantities had no influence on the feces. Nor had sugar, unless its fermentation produced diarrhea. Bread somewhat increased the volume of the feces, which contained some undigested starch. Here an irritation of the intestinal canal by the bread produced a larger excretion into the intestines.
 
Continue to: