Plaintiff, a broker, called on one of a committee of two appointed by a corporation to secure a loan for it, and stated that the loan could be obtained from a certain company, and that he had spoken to the company, and would expect a commission if defendant made the loan; the committee said that if another broker did not succeed by the next day, they would be glad to have plaintiff make the commission; on the next day, the committeeman told plaintiff that the other broker was unable to procure the loan, and plaintiff again stated the company of which he had spoken; the committeeman stated that he wished information as to the matter of taxes, and plaintiff introduced to him a person who gave the desired information; said committeeman was in constant communication with his colleague, and testified that he communicated to him all matters of interest in regard to the loan; the loan was finally obtained from the company suggested by plaintiff. Held, that plaintiff's right to a commission was a question for the jury. Rogers v. Evan. Bap. Ben. & Mis. So., 168 Mass. 592, 47 N. E.

434; Cadigan v. Crabtree, 192 Mass. 233, 78 N. E. 412; Fox v. Cammeyer, Inc., 156 N. Y. Sup. 1046, 93 Misc. Rep. 180; McLaughlin & Co. v. Southern Hotel Co., 177 N. Y. Sup. 323.