For the purpose of showing the intention of the accused, the prosecution may prove previous and subsequent acts of illicit relations between him and the female.123

And the intention of the accused may also be shown by proving the general reputation of the house to which the female was taken by him.124

The motive or intention of the accused may also be shown by any correspondence between him and the female.125

117 Bunfill vs. People, 154 111., 647;

Miller vs. State, 120 Ind., 294.

118 Henderson vs. People, 124 111., 616.

119 Bradshaw vs. People, 153 111., 160. 120 Id. 121 Slocum vs. People, 90 111., 274;

Lyons vs. State, 52 Ind., 426. 132 Bradshaw vs. People, 153 Ill., 159; Hughes Cr. Law, Sec. 250. 123 People vs. Carrier, 46 Mich., 442. 124 State vs. Chisenhall, 106 N. C, 676. 125 State vs. Overstreet, 43 Kan., 299.

The enticing away of the female only for the purpose of having illicit intercourse with her is no offense. It must appear that the accused intended to reduce her to the condition of a common prostitute or concubine before the offense is complete.126