(j) Buxton v. Banghan. 6 Cat & P. 674; Scott v. Jester. 8 Eng. (Ark.) 43V; Lowe v. Martin, 18 111. 286.

(k) Leuckhart v. Cooper, 2 Hodg 150, 3 Bing. N. C. 99

(l) Buxton v. Banghan, 6 C. & P. 674. The plaintiff sent his carriage to be painted, paying the painter beforehand the full price of the work. The painter, without any authority from the plaintiff, stored the carriage on the premises of the defendant, under an agreement that it was to remain for a fortnight without charge, but that if it stood longer, hire should be charged. The painter did not paint the carriage, and never removed it. At the end of several months, the plain* tiff discovered where the carriage was stored and subsequently demanded it of the defendant. The latter refused to deliver it. unless the owner paid his charge for standing. This the owner refused to do, and brought an action of trover against the defendant The Court of Exchequer held, that the person to whom the carriage was intrusted for painting, bad no right to make a bargain lor the storage, unless expressly author ized by the owner; and not having such authority, his act could confer no lien in favor of the defendant Judgment was accordingly given for the plaintiff Boardman v Sill, I Camp. 410, n.

(m) Stevenson v. Blakelock, I M. & S 535; St John v. Diffendorf, 12 Wend. 261; Dennett v. Cutts, 11 N H 163; Cage v. Wilkinson, 3 Sm. & Marsh. 214; Walker v. Sargent, 14 Vt. 247; Christy v Douglas, Wright, 485 ; Reed v. Bos-tick. 6 Humph 321 , McDonald v. Napier, 14 Ga. 89; Kinsey v. Stewart, 14 Tex. 457.

1 An attorney who is to receive under an agreement a specific sum out of the proceeds of land, if recovered, when the land is recovered and sold by his client, a bond being taken for the purchase-money, has a lien on the bond for such money due him for his services. McPherson v. Cox, 96 U. S. 404 An attorney has a lien on money collected for services in so doing, and may insist on a receipt on final settlement Dow. ling v Eggemann, 47 Mich. 171. An attorney has no such lien in a cause before judgment as to prevent his client from settling with the adverse party without his consent or knowledge. Simmons v Almv, 103 Mass. 33; Coon v. Plymouth Plank Road, 32 Mich. 248. An attorney's right of lien for compensation and disbursements upon his client's moneys received by him in the course of his employment is not confined to moneys recovered by judgment, nor affected by the fact that the client is an executor, and the services rendered to and the moneys received on behalf of the estate. In re Knapp, 85 N. Y. 284. An attorney's lien on a judgment recovered by him will be enforced according to the law of the State where the lien attached, and not where it is sought to be collected. Citizens' Bank v Culver, 54 N. H. 327, where it was said that in Vermont, where the lien in question attached, such a lien covered not only term, attorney's, and travelling fees, and money expended by the. attorney, but charges for his arguments. - K.

* His lien also covers the amount of an award in favor of his client; (s) and if the amount of an award or judgment be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff after notice to pay over to the attorney, or collusively discharged, he may recover the amount of the defendant, (t) Upon the papers of a third person left with

(n) Lann v. Church, 4 Mad. 391. (o) Welsh v. Hole, Doug. 238; Wil-kins v. Carmichael, Doug. 104; Bradt v. Koon, 4 Cow. 416; Ex parte Plitt, 2 Wallace, Jr. 453; Fowler v. Morrill, 8 Tex. 153; Young v. Dearborn, 7 Fost. (N. H.) 324; Creighton v. Ingersoll, 20 Barb. 541; Collins v. Hathaway, Olcott, Adm. 176; Hongh v. Edwards, 37 Eng. L. & Eq. 470.

(p) Welsh v. Hole, Dong. 238; Swain v. Senet, 2 B. & P. N. R. 99; Power v. Kent, 1 Cow. 172; Ward v. Wadsworth, 1 E. D. Smith, 198.

(q) Potter v. Mayo, 3 Oreenl. 34; Getchell v. Clark, 5 Mass. 309; Foot v.

Tewksbury, 2 Vt. 97; Hutchinson v. Pettes, 18 Vt. 614; Sweet v. Bartlett, 4 Sandf. (S. C.) 661.

(r) Griffin v. Eyles, 1 H. Bl. 122.

(s) Omerod v. Tate, 1 East, 464; Hutchinson v. Howard, 15 Vt. 544; Loyd v. Mansell, 16 E. L. & Eq. 211.

(t) Cowell v. Batterlev, 10 Bing. 432; 2 Dow. P. C. 780; Eisdeil v. Coningham, 4 Hurl. & Nor. 871; Finder v. Morris, 3 Caines, 165; Martin v. Hawkes, 15 Johns. 405; Ten Broeck v. De Witt, 10 Wend. 617. If there be a settlement between the parties, without notice from the attorney, the defendant will not be liable. 2 N. H. 541. In Missouri, a defendant the attorney by his client, the latter has only a special lien for the expenses of that matter, and he cannot retain them for his client's general balance. He cannot acquire from his client a lien of a higher nature than the interest which the client himself has in the papers, (u) But his lien holds good against the assignees of his client, upon all papers of the latter which come into his hands before the bankruptcy, (v) If papers are delivered to an attorney upon a special agreement, or for a particular purpose upon a special trust, he cannot retain them for a general lien, or even for the money due in that very business, (w)

1 Horton v. Champlin, 12 R. I. 550, declared that an attorney's lien on a judgment for his client originates in the control which his retainer gives him not only over it, but the legal process to enforce it, by which he may collect the judgment and reimburse himself; that to the amount of his fees and expenses he has an equitable right to control the judgment against his client and opponent, if the latter is in collusion with his client, which the court in its discretion will protect and enforce, as well as in matters of equitable set-off; but the lien does not authorize an action on the judgment without the client's consent and direction. An attorney has no lien to secure his fee on land recovered by him for his client in ejectment. Martin v. Harrington, 57 Miss. 208. - K.

2 Notice of an attorney's claim of lien on a judgment must be given in writing to bind a judgment creditor, or those claiming through him. Phillips v. Germon, 43 la. 101. - K.