1 The buyer of goods sold on Sunday, who has asserted and maintained his title against the seller for a trespass on the goods, is not estopped to set up the defence of sabbatical illegality in an action by the seller for the price. Thompson v. Williams, 58 N. H. 248.

* A question has been made also, whether the invalidity of a contract made on Sunday can be set up against an innocent party, as the innocent indorsee of a note made on Sunday. We think not; but this question is not settled. (h) l But it seems that an official bond, executed on Sunday, is not void as to the parties to be thereby protected. (i) And where a tort cognizable in admiralty has been committed, it is no defence that the vessel was prosecuting her voyage on Sunday. (j)