18 Stowell v. Ins. Co., 163 N. Y. 29S; 57 N. E. 480.

19 Hopkins v. Ry., 29 Kan. 544.

1 Housekeeper Publishing Co. v. Swift, 97 Fed. 290; 38 C. C. A. 187; Smith v. Bank, 89 Fed. 832; 32 C. C. A. 368; Bomar v. Rosser, 131 Ala. 215; 31 So. 430; Adams v. Turner, 73 Conn. 38; 46 Atl. 247; American Harrow Company v. Dol-vin, 119 Ga. 186; 45 S. E. 983; Carter v. Williamson, 106 Ga. 280; 31 S. E. 651; Maxwell v. Willing-ham, 101 Ga. 55; 28 S. E. 672; Beck" er v. Dalby (Ia.), 86 N. W. 314; Crane v. Williamson, 111 Ky. 271; 63 S. W. 610, 975; White v. Williams, 105 Ky. 802; 49 S. W. 808; St. Landry State Bank v. Meyers, 52 La. Ann. 1769; 28 So. 136; Baylor v. Butterfass, 82 Minn. 21; 84 N. W. 640; Ming v. Pratt. 22 Mont. 262: 56 Pac. 279; Aultman v. Hawk (Neb.), 95 N. W. 695; Hoffman v. Accident Co., 127 N. C. 337; 37 S.

E. 466; First National Bank v. Chandelier Co., 17 Ohio C. C. 443; Harley v. Weber, 1 Ohio C. D. 360; Kaufmann v. Friday. 201 Pa. St. 178; 50 Atl. 942; Ivery v. Phillips, 196 Pa. St. 1; 46 Atl. 133; Burwell & Dunn Co. v. Chapman, 59 S. C. 581; 38 S. E. 222; Martin v. Ry., 48 W. Va. 542; 37 S. E. 563; Coman v. Wunderlieh, - Wis. - ; 99 N. W. 612; Newell v. Canning Co., 119 Wis. 635; 97 N. W. 487.

2 Oliver v. Brown, 102 Ga. 157; 29 S. E. 159; Jacob Tome Institution v. Davis, 87 Md. 591; 41 Atl. 166.

3 Anderson v. Ins. Co., 112 Ga. 532; 37 S. E. 766.

4 Hodson v. Varney, 122 Cal. 619; 55 Pac. 413.

5 Drum-Flato Commission Co. v. Barnard, 66 Kan. 568; 72 Pac. 257; Lawrence v. Comstock, 124 Mich, 120; 82 N. W. 808.

6 Finnigan v. Shaw, 184 Mass. 112; 68 N. E. 35.

7 Norwood v. Lathrop, 178 Mass. 208; 59 N. E. 650; Daly v. Kingston. 177 Mass. 312; 58 N. E. 1109.

8 Hilgar v. Miller, 42 Or. 552; 72 Pac. 319.

9 Loth v. Friederick, 95 Mich. 598; 55 N. W. 369.

10 Prouty v. Adams, 141 Cal. 304; 74 Pac. 845.

11 Walker v. Price, 62 Kan. 327;

84 Am. St. Rep. 392; 62 Pac. 1001.

12 McLeod v. Hunt, 128 Mich. 124; 87 N. W. 101; O'Neal v. McLeod (Miss.), 28 So. 23.

13 Kelley v. Thompson, 175 Mass. 427; 56 N. E. 713.

14 Standard Fireproofing Co. v. Fireproofing Co., 177 Mo. 559; 76 S. W. 1008.

15 Russell v. Morgan, 24 R. I. 134; 52 Atl. 809.

16 Appeal of Cornwall, etc., R. R., 125 Pa. St. 232; 11 Am. St. Rep. 889; 17 Atl. 427.

17 Camden, etc.. Ry. v. Adams, 62 N. J. Eq. 656; 51 Atl. 24.

18 McElveen v. Ry.. 109 Ga. 249; 77 Am. St. Rep. 371 : 34 S. E. 281. 19 Webster v. Paul, 10 0. S. 531.

20 Louisville, etc., Ry. v. Duncan, 137 Ala. 446; 34 So. 988.

21 Chamberlain v. Ins. Co., 109 Wis. 4; 83 Am. St. Rep. 851; 85 N. W. 128.

22 Walton v. Ins. Co.. 116 N. Y. 317; 5 L. R. A. 677; 22 N. E. 443.

23 Frost's, etc., Works v. Ins. Co.,

37 Minn. 300; 5 Am. St. Rep. 846; 34 N. W. 35.

24 Burton v. Ins. Co., 119 Ind. 207; 12 Am. St. Rep. 405; 21 N. E. 746.

25 Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Phillips, 102 Fed. 19; 41 C. C. A. 263; reversing, 101 Fed. 33.

26 Arguimbau v. Ins. Co.. 106 La. 139; 30 So. 14S.

27 Smith v. Bank, 171 Mass. 178; 50 N. E. 545.

28 Leonard v. Miner. 120 Cal. 403; 52 Pac. 655; Henry Wood's Sons Co. v. Schaefer, 173 Mass. 443; 73 Am. St. Rep. 305; 53 N. E. 881; Lillie v. Bates, 2 Ohio C. D. 54. This rule, of course, assumes that the note is in other respects valid. If there is in fact no consideration for the note, this may, of course, be shown. See Sec. 273, 279.

29 Dominion National Bank v. Manning, 60 Kan. 729; 57 Pac. 949. (Questioning and distinguishing Higgins v. Ridgway, 153 N. Y. 130; 47 N. E. 32; Breneman v. Furniss, 90 Pa. 186; 35 Am. Rep. 651.)

30 Mills County National Bank v. Perry, 72 Ia. 15; 2 Am. St. Rep. 228; 33 N. W. 341.

31 See Sec. 1209.

32 Southern, etc., Co. v. Mfg. Co., 91 Md. 61; 46 Atl. 513.

33 Cook v. Brown, 62 Mich. 473; 4 Am. St. Rep. 870; 29 N. W. 46. (No mistake in execution being shown.)

34 Kulenkamp v. Groff, 71 Mich. 675; 15 Am. St. Rep. 283; 1 L. R. A. 594; 40 N. W. 57.

35 Mallory v. Fitzgerald's Estate, - Neb. -; 95 N. W. 601.

36 La Fayette County Monument Corporation v. Magoon, 73 Wis. 627; 3 L. R. A. 761; 42 N. W. 17.

37 Grand Isle v. Kinney, 70 Vt. 381; 41 Atl. 130.

38 Russell v. Smith, 115 Ia. 261; 88 N. W. 361.

39 Marsh v. Chown, 104 Ia. 556; 73 N. W. 1046; Brook v. Latimer, 44 Kan. 431; 21 Am. St. Rep. 292; 11 L. R. A. 805; 24 Pac. 946.

40 Wallace v. Langston, 52 S. C. 133; 29 S. E. 552.

41 Horn v. Hansen, 56 Minn. 43; 22 L. R. A. 617; 57 N. W. 315.

42 Price v. Marthen, 122 Mich. 655; 81 N. W. 551.

43 Stein v. Forgarty, 4 Ida. 702; 43 Pac. 681; Merrigan v. Hall, 175 Mass. 508; 56 N. E. 605; Vraden-burg v. Johnson, - Neb. - ; 91 N. W. 496.

44 Clement v. Houck, 113 Ia. 504; 85 N. W. 765.

45 Kimball v. Bryan, 56 Ia. 632; 10 N. W. 218.

46 Perry v. Bigelow, 128 Mass. 129.

47 Mosher v. Rogers, 117 111. 446; 5 N. E. 583.

48 Bender v. Montgomery, 8 Lea (Tenn.) 586.

49 Stull v. Thompson, 154 Pa. St. 43; 25 Atl. 890.

50 Singer Mfg. Co. v. Potter, 59 Minn. 240; 61 N. W. 23. But see Johnston v. McCart, 24 Wash. 19; 63 Pac. 1121, where such a contract was enforced.

51 Phelps v. Abbott, 114 Mich. 88; 72 N. W. 3.

52 Baugh v. Ramsey, 4 T. B. Mon. (Ky.) 155; Racine County Bank v. Keep, 13 Wis. 209.