If a creditor furnishes new collateral,1 or gives a mortgage,2 to secure a barred debt, or gives an order on a third person to secure such debt,3 the barred debt is thereby revived. The new period of limitations runs from the date of the collection of such order if the creditor uses good faith in making the collection, and not the date of the acceptance of the order.4 If the debtor executes a new note, evidencing a debt barred by limitations, such debt is thereby revived.5 The same effect has been held to follow a promise to execute a new note, even though such new note has not been executed.6 If, however, the debtor executes a note as mere duplicate evidence of the original debt, such duplicate does not operate to revive a barred debt, or prevent limitations from running.7 If the debtor offers to give a new note he waives the bar of the statute, even if he concludes, " If you think a note worthless, what will you take in cash and balance all I owe you."8

19 Hanna v. Kasson, 26 Wash. 568; 67 Pac. 271.

20 Neish v. Gannon, 198 111. 219; 64 N. E. 1000.

21 Gill v. Donovan, 96 Md. 518; 54 Atl. 117.

1 Hampton v. France (Ky.). 32 S. W. 950; Wolford v. Cook, 71 Minn. 77; 70 Am. St. Rep. 315; 73 N. W. 708; Taylor v. Hunt. 118 N. C. 168; 24 S. E. 359. Contra, Shepherd v. Thompson, 122 U. S. 231.

2 Maddox v. Walker's Executrix (Ky.), 74 S. W. 741.

3 Buffington v. Chase, 152 Mass.

534; 10 L. R. A. 123; 25 N. E. 977; Manchester v. Braedner, 107 N. Y. 346; 1 Am. St. Rep. 829; 14 N. E. 405.

4 Buffington v. Chase, 152 Mass. 534; 10 L. R. A. 123; 25 N. E. 977.

5 Wilcox v. Gregory, 135 Cal. 217; 67 Pac. 139.

6 Bowman v. Rector (Tenn. Ch. App.). 59 S. W. 389.

7 School District v. Cromer. 52 Ark. 454; 6 L. R. A. 510; 12 S. W. 878; Goodrich v. Case, 68 O. S. 187; 67 N. E. 295.

8 Rumsey v. Settle, 120 Mich. 372; 79 N. W. 579.