If a written contract with B, executed by A on behalf of X, is signed by A in such form as to bind him personally, the question of the right of the parties to the contract to show that A was the agent of X and that such contract was intended to bind X, depends on the nature of the contract and the purpose for which A's agency is to be shown. If B sues on the contract and A seeks to show that he was agent and X was principal in order to avoid liability, such evidence is inadmissible.1 If A signs his own name, without any addition thereto suggesting agency, the only effect of evidence showing A's agency and thereby relieving A from liability would be to contradict the terms of the contract. This rule applies to negotiable contracts such as notes2 and drafts, so that the agency of an indorser who signs his individual name, can not be shown to relieve him,3 and the fact that a number of persons who indorsed a note which was signed by a church intended to indorse as committeemen of such church, and not in their personal capacity, can not be shown to relieve them.4 It also applies to non-negotiable contracts,5 such as a contract of sale,6 a contract of subscription to corporate stock,7 a contract of warranty,8 or a contract on behalf of corporation to be formed, signed so as to bind the promoters individually,9 or a contract on behalf of an existing corporation, signed individually by the directors so as to bind them personally.10

8 Decided under Negotiable Instruments Law. First National Bank v. MeCullough, 50 Or. 508, 17 I.. R. A. (N. S.) 1105, 93 Pac. 366.

9 First National Bank v. Reinman, 93 Ark. 376, 28 L. R. A. (N.S.) 530, 125 S. W. 443.

10 United States National Bank v. Geer, 55 Neb. 462, 70 Am. St. Rep. 390, 41 L. R. A. 444, 75 N. W. 1088 [reversing on rehearing, 53 Neb. 67, 41 L. R A. 439, 73 N. W. 266].

1 United States. American Alkali Co. v. Bean, 125 Fed. 823.

Illinois. Vail v. Ins. Co., 192 111. 567, 61 N. E. 651.

Maine. Hancock v. Fairfield, 30 Me. 299.

Michigan. Cooper v. Sonk, 201 Mich. 655, 167 N. W. 842; Vaughan-Robertson Drug Co. v. Grimes-Mills Drug Co., 173 N. Car. 502, 92 S. E. 376.

Utah. Roe v. Schweitzer, - Utah, - , 184 Pac. 938.

2Lonnon v. Batchman, 103 Kan. 266, 173 Pac. 415; Sparks v. Despatch Co., 104 Mo. 531, 24 Am. St. Rep. 351, 12 L. R. A. 714, 15 S. W. 417; Shuey v. Adair, 18 Wash. 188, 63 Am. St. Rep. 879, 39 L. R. A. 473, 51 Pac. 388.

3 Condon v. Pearce, 43 Md. 83.