This section is from the book "Chemistry Of Food And Nutrition", by Henry C. Sherman. Also available from Amazon: Chemistry of food and nutrition.
The fecal matter passed per day varies considerably in health, but, on an ordinary mixed diet of digestible food materials, is usually between 100 and 200 grams of moist substance containing 25 to 50 grams of solids. The feces contain any indigestible substances swallowed with the food and any undigested residues of true food material; but ordinarily they appear to be largely composed of residues of the digestive juices, together with certain substances which have been formed in metabolism and excreted by way of the intestine, and bacteria, living and dead.
Prausnitz studied the feces of several persons placed alternately on meat and on rice diets and found that, although the solids of the meat were about ten times as rich in nitrogen as the solids of the rice, the two diets yielded feces whose solids were of practically the same composition. Some of the data of these experiments are shown in the table.
Person | Principal food | Nitrogen in DRY FECES PER CENT | Ether Extract IN DRY FECES PER CENT | Ash in dry FECES PER CENT |
H. . . . | Rice | 8.83 | 12.43 | 15.37 |
H. . . . | Meat | 8.75 | 15.96 | 14.74 |
M. . . . | Rice | 8.37 | 18.23 | 11.05 |
M. . . . | Meat | 9.16 | 16.04 | 12.22 |
W. P. . . | Rice | 8.59 | 15.89 | 12.58 |
W. P. . . | Meat | 8.48 | 17.52 | 13.13 |
In view of such results Prausnitz considers that "normal" feces have essentially the same composition irrespective of the food, the quantity of food residues in such "normal" feces being negligible. From this point of view the feces show not so much the extent to which the food has been absorbed as whether it is a large or a small feces-former. On the other hand, so far as the nitrogen compounds of the feces are concerned, it is probably true, as generally assumed, that they represent material either lost or expended in the work of digestion, and therefore that the nitrogen of the feces is to be deducted from that of the food in estimating the amount available for actual tissue metabolism. This, however, is by no means equally true of the ash constituents, many of which after being metabolized in the body are eliminated mainly by way of the intestine rather than through the kidneys.
On a liberal diet consisting entirely of non-nitrogenous food the amount of nitrogen in the feces was 0.5 to 0.9 gram per day, which is more than is sometimes found in feces from food furnishing enough protein to meet all the needs of the body. Thus the expenditure of nitrogenous material in the digestion of fats and carbohydrates may be larger than in the digestion of protein food.
The feces always contain fat (or at least substances soluble in ether) as well as protein. Fasting men have eliminated 0.57 to 1.3 grams of "fat" per day; and when the diet is very poor in fat, the feces may contain as much as was contained in the food. As the fat content of the food rises, the actual amounts in the feces increase, but the relative amounts decrease, so that up to a certain point the apparent percentage utilization of the fat becomes higher. The limit to the amount of fat which can be thus well digested varies with the individual and with the form in which the fat is given. Quantities up to 200 grams per day have been absorbed to within 2 to 3 per cent when given in the form of milk, cheese, or butter.
In addition to protein and fat the feces always contain various other forms of organic matter which in the routine proximate analyses usually made in connection with feeding experiments are collectively reported as "carbohydrates determined by difference."
With these facts in mind one may make use of the coefficients of digestibility without being misled by them. These coefficients show the relation between the constituents of the food consumed and the corresponding constituents of the feces. Thus if the feces from a given diet contain 5 per cent as much protein as was contained in the food, this proportion is assumed to have been lost or expended in digestion, and the coefficient of digestibility of the protein of the diet is stated to be 95 per cent. While as just shown this assumption is not entirely correct, yet it is approximately true of the organic nutriments that the difference between the amounts in the food and in the feces represents what is available to the tissues of the body, and thus these coefficients serve a useful purpose in the computation of the nutritive values of foods.
From the results of hundreds of digestion experiments At-water computed the coefficients of digestibility of the organic nutrients of the main groups of food materials, when used by man as part of a mixed diet, to be as follows: -
Protein PER CENT | Fat PER CENT | Carbohydrates PER CENT | |
Animal foods...................... | 97 | 95 | 98 |
Cereals and breadstuffs...... | 85 | 90 | 98 |
Dried legumes .......................... | 78 | 90 | 97 |
Vegetables......................... | 83 | 90 | 95 |
Fruits....... | 85 | 90 | 90 |
Total food of average mixed diet....... | 92 | 95 | 98 |
In some cases these figures are higher than have been reported for similar foods by other observers, the differences being due mainly to the fact (not formerly recognized) that a food may be more perfectly utilized when fed as part of a simple mixed diet than when fed alone. Milk is an example of such a food, and has when consumed as part of a mixed diet a much higher coefficient of digestibility than is often assigned to it on the basis of earlier experiments.
It will be seen that the coefficients differ less for the different types of food than might be expected from popular impressions of "digestibility" and "indigestibility." It is also noteworthy that the coefficients of digestibility are less influenced by the conditions under which the food is eaten and vary less with individuals than is generally supposed. In explanation of this it may be noted that general impressions of digestibility relate mainly to ease of digestion and particularly to ease and rapidity of gastric digestion, and that there is little direct relation between the ease with which a food is digested in the stomach and the extent to which it is ultimately digested in its passage through the entire digestive tract. Substances which are resistant to gastric digestion will tend to remain long in the stomach and will probably excite a greater flow of gastric juice. Thus a greater amount of acid chyme will enter the duodenum, and this will result in the secretion of a greater amount of pancreatic juice also.
Similarly an increase in the amount of food eaten may have little effect upon the coefficient of digestibility of the foodstuffs. In a series of experiments by the writer it was found that the doubling of a small diet decreased the coefficient of digestibility by less than 1 per cent. Snyder reports that as between medium and large amounts of oatmeal and milk, the protein was 7 per cent and the fat 6 per cent more completely absorbed in the case of the medium ration.
 
Continue to: