§ 1. Cases where the phantasm has been of a recognised voice - the words heard having been, certainly in some cases and possibly in others, those which the distant agent was uttering ....... 433-436

§ 2. Cases where what was heard was the percipient's own name - which is a very common form of purely subjective hallucination.

In most of these cases there may probably have been a certain occupation of the agent's thoughts with the percipient ..... 436-439

§ 3. Cases where the phantasm has been of an unrecognised voice . 439-442

§ 4. Cases where the impression was of a complete sentence, conveying either a piece of information or a direction, projected by the percipient as a message from without .......... 442-443

§ 5. An example [omitted. - Ed.] where the sound heard was vocal, but not recognised and articulate . . . . . . . . -443

§ 6. Phantasms of non-vocal noises or shocks. These are parallel to the rudimentary visual hallucinations; but need a more jealous scrutiny, since odd noises are often due to undiscovered physical causes in the vicinity. Still, some impressions of the sort are pretty clearly hallucinatory; and the form is one which telepathic hallucinations seem occasionally to take. [Gurney's examples are omitted. - Ed.] ......... 443-444