This section is from the book "Chemistry Of Food And Nutrition", by Henry C. Sherman. Also available from Amazon: Chemistry of food and nutrition.
At one time it was supposed that muscular power was generated at the expense of muscle substance and this, of course, necessitated the belief that muscular work always increased protein metabolism. Since we now know that the muscles work quite as well at the expense of carbohydrates and fats as of protein, the conclusion that muscular work necessarily increases the metabolism of protein is far from inevitable. It is only necessary to observe the effects of regular muscular exercise, either in athletic training or in normal labor, to see that the muscles do not waste away when thus used, but rather tend to become larger. Such a growth of the muscles tends toward a storage rather than a loss, of protein. Usually, however, muscular work also results in increased appetite, and it is difficult to separate the effects of the exercise from those of the extra food.
Whether muscular work acts directly to increase the amount of protein metabolized in the body can only be determined by experiments in which sufficient extra fats and carbohydrates are fed to furnish the extra fuel required on the working days. But since fats and carbohydrates spare protein, the feeding of these in any excess over just what is necessary to provide for the increased energy requirement would tend to decrease the metabolism of protein and counteract any effect which the muscular work might otherwise have in increasing protein metabolism. Hence, in order to show conclusively whether muscular work of itself has any influence upon the protein metabolism, it would be necessary to determine the mechanical efficiency of the man, then to bring him into equilibrium with an amount of food just sufficient for his needs, and finally to have him perform a measured amount of work at the same time adding to his diet an amount of fats and carbohydrates just sufficient to furnish the extra energy required for the work performed. Such elaborate experiments have not yet been made, but we have sufficient data to show that they are not necessary for practical purposes. Many experiments have shown conclusively that increased work, when accompanied by a sufficient increase in the amount of fats and carbohydrates fed, does not necessarily increase the metabolism of protein.
The following data from Atwater (Report of the Storrs, Connecticut, Agricultural Experiment Station for 1902-1903, page 127) show the average results of a long series of rest and work experiments with men in the respiration calorimeter:
Nature of Experiment | Average Metabolism per Day | |||||
Per Person | Per Kilogram Body Weight | Per Square Meter Surface | ||||
Energy, Calories | Protein, Grams | Energy, Calories | Protein, Grams | Energy, Calories | Protein, Grams | |
Rest: Food generally sufficient for equilibrium; 5 subjects, 27 experiments, covering 82 days .................................... | 2310 | 103.8 | 33.5 | 1.5I | 1116 | 50.1 |
Work: 8 hours per day. Food generally not quite sufficient for equilibrium; 3 subjects, 24 experiments, covering 76 days........ | 4556 | 108.1 | 62.9 | 1.49 | 2129 | 50.5 |
Comparing the figures either per unit of weight or of surface, it will be seen that muscular work sufficient to nearly double the energy metabolism had no appreciable effect upon the amount of protein metabolized. Considering the large amount of exceptionally accurate research represented in these figures, they seem to justify the conclusion that if muscular work has any tendency to increase the "wear and tear" of muscle substance, such effect is normally balanced by the tendency of the muscles to grow (and therefore store protein) when exercised.
Moreover, it is certain that any effect which muscular work might possibly have in increasing protein metabolism would be incomparably less than its effect in increasing the total metabolism. If, then, starting with a diet which maintains protein equilibrium at rest, the total food is increased sufficiently to provide for the muscular work, and the increase in the diet is accomplished by adding any reasonable combination of food materials, we may feel sure that these will supply plenty of protein to meet any possible increase in the protein requirement. Hence, in planning the diet of a man at hard muscular work, any reasonable combination of foodstuffs given in sufficient abundance to meet the energy requirement will almost certainly supply an ample amount of protein.
Shaffer has studied the output of ammonia, creatinine, and uric acid as well as of total nitrogen during rest and work and finds no significant change in any of these. Lusk considers it fully proved that neither the amount nor the character of protein metabolism is changed by muscular activity.
 
Continue to: