This section is from the book "Fermented Alcoholic Beverages, Malt Liquors, Wine, And Cider", by C. A. Crampton. Also available from Amazon: Fermented Beverage Production, Second Edition.
Quassiin gives a brown coloration with ferric chloride. The reaction is best observed by moistening a quassiin residue in porcelain with a few drops of a weak alcoholic solution of ferric chloride, and applying a gentle heat. A fine mahogany-brown coloration is produced.
The most delicate and characteristic test for quassiin is based on an observation of Christensen. On treating quassiin with bromine a derivative is obtained, which is stated to be more bitter than the original substance. On adding caustic soda the bitter taste is said to be destroyed, but a product of a fine yellow color is obtained. I am unable to confirm the destruction of the bitter taste, at least entirely, but the coloration is marked and characteristic.
The following is the best way of applying the test: The substance to be tested for quassiin is dissolved in a little chloroform, or if a liquid is agitated with chloroform, and the aqueous layer separated. The chloroformic solution is then treated with bromine water until the yellow color remains after agitation, showing that the bromine has been used in slight excess. The aqueous liquid is then removed (or if small in volume may be neglected), and the chloroform agitated with ammonia. This produces immediate destruction of the color duo to the bromine, and if quassiin be absent both the chloroform and ammoniacal liquid will be colorless. In presence of quassiin the ammonia will be colored a bright yellow.
' Possibly more complete precipitation of quassiin by tannin could be effected in an alcoholic solution.
The chloroform residues from camomiles, calumba, colocynth, cocculus, and chiretta do not give any similar reactions with bromine and ammonia. The ether residue from chiretta gives a straw-yellow coloration, gradually changing to a dull purplish brown, but the fact that no such reaction yielded by the chloroform solution of the drug renders confusion with quassia impossible. Picric acid yields a solution in chloroform which is but slightly colored compared with the deep-yellow liquid produced on subsequent agitation with ammonia; but if its presence be suspected it can be readily and completely removed by agitating the chloroformic solution with soda or ammonia, and separating the alkaline liquid before employing bromine.
With a view of ascertaining how far the foregoing reactions of quassiin were likely to be of service in practice I added to one liter of a mild beer, which had been previously proved to yield no bitter principle to chloroform after treatment with acetate of lead, sufficient infusion of quassia to make a perceptible difference in the flavor. The liquid was concentrated, precipitated with neutral lead acetate, the filtrate treated with sulphuretted hydrogen, and the refiltered liquid further concentrated and agitated with chloroform. On evaporating the chloroform a residue was obtained which had an intensely bitter taste, and yielded a solution which gave a white precipitate with tannin, but did not reduce ammonio-nitrate of silver. The residue gave no color on warming with concentrated sulphuric acid, but gave a well-developed mahogany-brown color with ferric chloride. By the bromine and ammonia test it gave a strong yellow coloration.
The amount of residue obtained would have sufficed to obtain all these reactions several times, so that it may be considered established that quassia can be detected with certainty and facility in a moderate quantity of beer containing it.
The employment of chiretta as a hop substitute has been repeatedly recorded by previous observers, but no tests are given for it by Dragendorff or others who have worked on the subject. I found it in quantity in two hop substitutes I recently examined, and suspect its presence in a third. The active principle (chiratin, C25H28O15) is intensely bitter, sparingly soluble in cold water, rather more so in hot, and is readily dissolved by alcohol and ether, the latter solvent readily removing it from its aqueous solution. On the other hand, chloroform removes but little bitter principle from an aqueous infusion of chiretta. Chiratin is a neutral substance, decomposed by dilute acids into ophelic acid and chiratogenin. It does not reduce Fehling's solution, gives a copious precipitate with tannin, and is not precipitated by neutral lead acetate. The reaction of the other residue from infusion of chiretta with bromine and ammonia has already been described.
It is evident that our knowledge of the chemistry of the vegetable bitters available as hop substitutes is very incomplete, and it is only by its further study we can hope to fully solve the problem of their detection in beer. But I believe we can already distinguish with certainty and facility between "hops" and "not hops," and that ought to suffice in many cases. When we examine butter we are content to define the admixture as "foreign fat," and we make no attempt to specify the exact nature or origin of the foreign fat employed. I submit that we are fully able to take a similar position with respect to hops and hop substitutes.
The following are some of the remarks made in the discussion of this paper :2
Dr. Adams said that he worked on the question of hop substitutes some ten or twelve years ago, and he found no difficulty in distinguishing between the bitter of hop and the substitutes used for it. The method he found most useful was the pre-cipitation by subacetate of lead, and there was no difficulty at all with the ordinary bitters such as quassia, calumba, gentian, chiretta, and wormwood, all remaining in solution, whilst the bitter of nop, and also the bitter of the camomile, which behaves like the hop, goes down and leaves the solution bitterless. He had specimens of all the hop substitutes in use in England at that time, and without a single exception the solution remained bitter after treatment with the subacetate of lead.
2Ibid., p. 114.
After having separated the filtrate and evaporated it down, there was no difficulty in detecting the bitter; but he did not think there was any possibility of distinguishing between the individual bitters, considering the minute quantity present, and one could only positively say there was another bitter present besides that of the hop.
 
Continue to: