We recently witnessed a vivid and possibly rather extreme example with an attractive young nurse in her mid-twenties. I had not seen her for a number of years, but I could not help noticing her face was abnormally swollen. She visited me, eager for information as she related her story. In nursing, annual X-rays of the chest were in order and, besides these, she had a considerable amount of corrective dental work done, with a succession of teeth X-rays. At the precious stage of life for a young girl, when one should be full of fun and animated chatter, her jaw was seizing up.

"I talked as if I had marbles in my mouth. I found it most embarrassing." She continued, "My jaw would also have a tendency to make a cracking sound." Singing lessons were tried in an effort to improve the flexibility, but the underlying cause was only being further aggravated. Painful arthritis of the jaw was the next diagnosis, with further X-rays. I audibly groaned at this point of her story, for recently I have had several young people brought to me with serious atomic conflictions aggravated also by successive X-rays.

However, young people around us are beginning to catch on, and it was her younger sister who correctly determined her alignment and she channelled under her sister's direction. Her eyes shone in proud recognition as she continued, "It was tremendous! All of a sudden my jaw started to flex in a co-ordinated way. I felt it happen so suddenly it astounded me." The swelling associated with the trouble disappeared within a few hours and she demonstrated how she could now manoeuvre her mouth and jaw with ease.

The atomic strategy behind these cases which have been detailed, is to realign the atomic magnetic moments in the X-rayed bone to co-ordinate with those of the main body structure.

At this point we feel licensed to do a little speculation on teeth X-rays. One wonders if our teeth would not be subject to less decay if the circulation were improved and distribution of calcium and nutrients more efficient. Indications are that X-rays appear to interfere with both. To speculate further, it also appears within the realm of possibility that tooth decay bacteria could be destroyed and kept under control through concentrating the hot spray well on the teeth while using the P.H.S. method described in Chapter X (So Little Can Do So Much) (So Little Can Do So Much). Once a week should be sufficient. We have certainly proved that bacteria and viruses can be successfully destroyed through using this method. These are pleasant contemplations and with the added aid of proper diet, well within the realm of probability. Our own energies can be regarded as our strongest allies and best anti-bodies; the lymph glands of a healthy person are filled with them.

Statistics fortunately do have a way of eventually telling the truth and alerting the public. The late Senator E. L. Bartlett of Alaska, showed interest and concern over X-rays in his article which appeared in Pageant magazine of August 1968, entitled "Is Your Next X-ray Worth the Risk?" One quotation that coincides with our findings is as follows:

Continuing exposure to small amounts of ionizing radiation from X-ray machines or radioactive materials may cause injuries that appear long after exposure has ended.

The price we pay for X-rays is sometimes unavoidable as in the case of X-rays for broken bones. However, an article by Ralph Nader entitled, "Wake Up, America. X - Unsafe - Rays", opens with the subtitle, "It's shocking but true: 90 per cent of all medical radiation is unnecessary. You'll want to show this report by a top safety expert to your own doctor and to your dentist."

A newspaper article quotes the opinion of Dr. Karl Z. Morgan, a radiation specialist. He is the director of the health physics division of the Atomic Energy Commission's Oak Ridge Laboratory, editor of the Journal of Health Physics, and a member of the national committee on radiation protection. In an address to students at Davidson College, North Carolina, reported by the Associated Press, January 28, 1971, he stated the most serious peacetime radiation threat is not nuclear power plants but ordinary medical and dental X-rays. The biggest offenders are dental X-rays and photofluro-graphic X-rays; the latter are frequently used by mobile units to give chest X-rays. He is quoted as saying, "There can be no threshold dose so low that the probability of serious damage is zero."

The Vancouver Sun, of March 20th, 1971 refers to an editorial written by Dr. Leonard Sagan, of the Palo Alto Medical Clinic, appearing in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Dr. Sagan recommends that doctors should drastically reduce their use of X-rays lest a limit be imposed upon them by the government. Medical diagnostic radiation has nearly doubled in the last seven years - much of it unnecessarily.

Radiations can cause cancer and genetic damage; the editorial warns that doctors should therefore exercise concern and impose their own controls or "others will do so."

How simple and refreshing the presentation of this knowledge would be if we could work with a generation of fortunate individuals who have not been subjected to masses of X-rays. During my original findings, I worked mainly with young children who had not been near an X-ray machine. They were able to readily and accurately record their energies and their unobstructed magnetic arrangement made research results consistent.

The more X-rays a person has been exposed to, the harder it is to reinstate their original atomic arrangement. Reinstate it strong enough to withstand the testing of other waves without being affected by the foreign influences.

A dentist who attempts to brainwash patients with the words, "Our X-ray machine is harmless. You will receive no more radiation than you would if exposed to a few hours of sunshine on the beach", must surely have his tongue in his cheek. Our answer is, "We can detect the wave confliction caused by the X-ray in the bones of the body and head until the person dies or has the confliction erased. A few hours sunshine on the beach would have no effect on the bones. Is this comparison valid?"

To our knowledge, nothing in dental or medical text books teaches the most basic law of all life, "atomic alignment". Therefore, does their present knowledge extend far enough for them to qualify as judges? Exploration into the magnetics of our bodies definitely reveals the continual wave confliction in bones caused by X-ray influences; confliction of a normal flow of life-giving magnetic waves. X-rays are a disrupting force causing damage which accumulates with each succeeding year for the duration of a person's life.

Sunshine has no effect on the bone's alignment but X-rays do! Consequently we should challenge the validity of the comparison. We are reminded of Kipling's comment, "The truth is often twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools".

The present technique for realigning X-rayed bones helps substantially to erase wave interference but it must be regarded as a compromise only. It is virtually impossible to realign the bone structure with the strong alignment that it originally acquired at the time when the bone solidified. As we grow older our bones harden and lack the flexibility of those of the new born. The weaker arrangement in realigned bones can be disrupted easily; jet planes and other strong energy sources can upset the corrected alignment. The first time I flew to Hawaii the correction I had made in my left X-rayed foot became disorientated and I had to realign it once more, using the method we will describe in the following chapter.